Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Mangoes

Congressman targets Pakistani mangoes

A U.S. congressman is criticizing $30 million in funding to help increase imports of mangoes from Pakistan.

Rep. Tom Reed, Republican of New York, said in a statement that U.S. Agency for International Development funds for Pakistani mango imports is an “example of egregious and wasteful government spending.”

“This is ridiculous,” Reed said in the April 25 statement. “While domestic fruit farmers struggle to get by, we aid Pakistani farmers? Our national debt stands at more than $15.3 trillion, yet we borrow money that our children and grandchildren will have to pay back in order to boost Pakistani mangoes.”

Reed said he would look very closely at future funding for USAID.

“This just demonstrates how dysfunctional our government has become when $30 million can be wasted without anyone stopping the expense.”

In 2010, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service gave the green light for Pakistani mango imports.

The first shipments arrived in the U.S. in July 2011. Quantities were limited — three shipments totaling less than 15,000 pounds.


Comments (7) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Matt    
Report Abuse
Watsonville  |  May, 02, 2012 at 10:47 PM

I agree with Rep. Reed... I believe for $30Million I could get 16K LBS. from Mango trees in Alaska... I could drive the $14.2B "bridge to nowhere" to plant the trees, send money...

Aamir    
New York  |  May, 03, 2012 at 04:08 PM

The Congressman should taste Pakistani mangoes first before condemning them. They are among the best in the world and if the US consumer now has a choice in mangoes , whats the problem ?

Congressman really wants to cut money he should try to slash the massive military budget.

Ahsan    
Report Abuse
Los Angeles  |  May, 10, 2012 at 12:47 PM

Who gets this money ? If a government agency is getting this money it will be pocketed by the government officials.

Aaron    
New York  |  May, 14, 2012 at 03:07 PM

its not about helping Pakistani farmers or wasting tax payers money. It's about what Pakistani in the US want to eat and willing to spend thier money just as they pay for Mangoes from other south american countries. The congressman has no issue importing mangoes from South American countries so why Pakistani mangoes are targeted. Domestic fruite farmemer can't even come close to Pakistani mangoes.

mujeeb lodhi    
Report Abuse
newyork  |  July, 11, 2012 at 07:35 PM

i promise if mr reed taste one pakistani "mango" he will be change person.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight