Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Potatoes

Mexican proposal puts more limits on potato trade

(UPDATED COVERAGE, Jan. 3) Potato industry leaders are saying an unexpected turnaround by the Mexican government concerning potato import rules would further restrict U.S. access rather than expand it.

For a decade the two countries and potato industry leaders have been working to increase access for U.S. growers. Fresh potatoes from the U.S. are restricted to a 16-mile border zone in Mexico.

In September it looked like the invisible line would be erased because the Mexican government published a proposed rule for full access. It was expected to become law this month. That proposal included mitigation measures for six pests identified by an international panel of experts as the only ones likely to cause problems for Mexico’s potato industry.

Keeling “In November they published a document ignoring the experts and naming 80 pests,” said John Keeling, chief executive officer for the National Potato council, Washington, D.C.

The Nov. 20 proposed rule also calls for irradiation of potatoes being imported into Mexico. Keeling said the combined effect of that requirement and the list of 80 pests will further restrict U.S. exports of fresh potatoes to Mexico, rather than open up the country as was detailed in a 2003 market access agreement.

The Mexican government is accepting comments on the proposed rule for 60 days after the Nov. 20 publication date. Comments must be submitted in Spanish and “must be of a scientific and technical basis,” according to a report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Foreign Agricultural Service.

The USDA report includes additional details on how to comment.

Keeling said it is not clear why the Nov. 20 proposal is so different than the one published in September. He has hopes the election of Mexico’s new president Enrique Pena Nieto will help with efforts to restore the previous plan.

“We are encouraging (growers and exporters) to submit comments describing their mitigation measures,” Keeling said.

Some in the fresh produce industry believe the about face on the potato rule is a retaliatory move by Mexico in response to Florida tomato growers challenging the suspension agreement for their commodity.

However, Keeling doesn’t think the trade issues are dependent on each other.

“When you have a trade dispute as big as the tomato agreement it of course colors all aspects of trade,” Keeling said Jan. 2.

“But the potato discussion has been going on for years and has been contentious. I really don’t think the tomato agreement has any impact on us (the potato industry).”

Jungmeyer Lance Jungmeyer, president of the Fresh Produce Association of the Americas in Nogales, Ariz., is concerned about the potato rule, as well as the U.S. tomato suspension agreement with Mexico. However, he stopped short of saying the two trade issues are related.

“Absent pest concerns, we support open markets between the U.S. and Mexico for all items, but unfortunately we’ve been drawn into a wild goose chase that is sapping away resources to move trade forward between both countries,” Jungmeyer said Jan. 3.

“The food production in both countries is complementary, and consumers in both countries should be able to enjoy food at reasonable prices that meets market demand.”

Full access to the Mexican market would allow U.S. growers to reach 70 million to 80 million more consumers, Keeling said. Industry leaders say full access would mean $150 million in export value to U.S. growers.

The National Potato Council plans to submit comments on the Nov. 20 proposal, as does the Idaho Potato Commission, said Patrick Kole, commission vice president of legal and government affairs.

“We plan to submit comments the week of Jan. 14 and will discuss in broad terms the pest mitigation and other factors,” Kole said.

“The U.S. potato industry speaks with one voice on this issue and we know the National Potato Council is working to deliver the message.”

The Washington Potato Commission, Moses Lake, Wash., also plans to submit comments, said Matt Harris, assistant executive director. He said Washington exported 21,000 tons of potatoes to Mexico this past year.

“We are trying to figure out why they made the change,” Harris said. “There is no clear answer to that question. For 10 years they were working in one direction and then (in November) everything changed.”

A bipartisan group of 17 U.S. senators from potato-producing states is also pursuing enforcement of the terms of the 2003 agreement. The senators sent a letter to President Barack Obama on Dec. 21 asking for the administration’s help to resolve the potato export issue.

Senators who signed that letter were: Mark Udall, D-Colo.; Michael Bennet, D-Colo.; Mike Crapo, R-Idaho; Kent Conrad, D-N.D.; Carl Levin, D-Mich.; Maria Cantwell, D-Wash.; John Hoeven, D-N.D.; Susan Collins, R-Maine; Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn.; Patty Murray, D-Wash.; Max Bacus, D-Mont.; James Risch, R-Idaho; Ron Wyden, D-Ore.; Al Franken, D-Minn.; Ron Johnson, R-Wis.; Jon Tester, D-Mont.; and Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich.


Prev 1 2 Next All


Comments (11) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Larry Harrison    
Report Abuse
Arizona  |  December, 28, 2012 at 07:58 PM

Why would the 5 rulling famialies give up a slice of the pie? Everything is controled thru them, from Seed, acarage, and Marketing.

andy    
Report Abuse
mex  |  December, 30, 2012 at 10:44 PM

Mexico dosent need to open up de borders to the american potatoes. There is enough
mexican potatoes in the market and the prices are very low for the growers. If this
happen prices are going to be lower than the cost production. This would kick out of the
market the mexican growers.

Bill    
Report Abuse
McAllen  |  December, 31, 2012 at 02:26 PM

They will allow smuggled in and they will tun their head. Cost 10,000.00 per load why would they want legal in.... Their is no money In legal Spuds going in they like the contraband just like the Apples get a judge to approve it and see how much money the officials will make.

Max    
Report Abuse
Immokalee  |  January, 02, 2013 at 08:58 AM

I have a comment, Close the Border to ALL Traffic!

Charlie    
Report Abuse
California  |  January, 02, 2013 at 09:07 AM

Could this be the opening salvo from Mexico retaliating for the administration's stance on Mexican tomatoes? The potato industry refused to weigh in on this issue. I hope this doesn't get worse.

Gil    
Report Abuse
Nogales  |  January, 02, 2013 at 09:41 AM

“Mexico shoots another one across the bow”, or… “You say Tomato, I say Potato”… let’s call the whole thing off.

Chuck    
Report Abuse
Fla  |  January, 02, 2013 at 10:36 AM

Why don't we impose the same pest list for imported Mexican tomatoes? Potatoes have
many common pests and diseases with tomatoes both being in the same family of plants.
Of course this would require some "huevos" by the Americans in these negotiations. I
thought we have free trade with Mexico, we all now see it is selective free trade usually at
the behest of the American farmer.

dhinds    
Report Abuse
Guadalajara  |  January, 03, 2013 at 09:03 PM

An unthinkable option for anyone not from Florida.

dhinds    
Report Abuse
Guadalajara  |  January, 03, 2013 at 09:16 PM

Neither the September nor the November Policies reflect the position of the Mexico's
current Federal Government, which took office in December, so it's too soon to tell what
the new Administration's stance will be be. Mexico's new Secretary of Agriculture was
Governor of the Border State of Coahuila, which could favor increased flexibility.

Additionally, the current POTUMS (President of the United Mexican States) is more
Statesman-like and less combative than his predecessor.

In view of the above, I predict a favorable solution to BOTH Ag Trade problems for all
concerned (except perhaps for Florida). -)

Paul    
Report Abuse
Idaho  |  January, 07, 2013 at 06:03 PM

Agree, let´s close the border to all.

Peter    
Report Abuse
USA  |  January, 07, 2013 at 06:44 PM

We care of our soil, I don´t want Mexican soil or Mexican seed on my farm, so I
understand that Mexicans, they don´t want our contaminated soil too. So best way is
close the border for this kind of products. I understand that potato is the main business
of Salazar Family in Colorado, that´s why Government is pushing, have the whole
support of them. Actually we already export a lot of tons of processed potatoes. Let´s
keep it clean, or at least as we already are.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight