Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Issue Announcement

Deadline passes, but companies still working on PTI

The Produce Traceability Initiative is now five years old. The deadline for meeting seventh and final milestone — tracking data on outbound packages — has come and gone with the end of 2012, and receivers are still working to get into compliance.

The program gets high marks from growers, shippers and PTI planners.

Dan Vache, the United Fresh Produce Association’s vice president of supply chain management and co-chairman of the PTI Technology Working Group, says he gives PTI a rating of “about a 7” on a 1-10 scale.

“On the supply side, I’d give it more like an 8, and on the receiving side, more like a 6,” he said.

The lower rating for receivers is understandable, since the first milestones were meant to apply to suppliers, Vache said.

“They had to get their ducks in a row, make some investment in their business,” he said.

The first milestones passed and suppliers started getting their systems set up, and then they started to communicate with their trading partners, which slowed up the process, Vache said.

“There was a slight gap on the supply side and the buy side in who actually was working on the PTI,” he said.

One problem was information technology personnel sometimes weren’t part of the communications chain, and PTI is an IT issue, Vache said.

“The majority of communication between trading partners is between the seller and the buyer. The IT people and operations people don’t talk,” he said.

But IT personnel are central to moving PTI forward, Vache said.

“When it comes to traceability, those groups are the ones that have to do traceability, not the salespeople or the buyers,” he said.

The buying side made some progress in implementing PTI. It just that much of it was behind the scenes, Vache said.

“It’s a lot of systems changes for them in their IT groups and their receiving process,” he said.

The system also required capital expenditures, installations and learning curves, Vache said.

Retail distribution center are catching up quickly to where the supply side is, he said.

“And we now see anywhere, depending on what DC you walk into, you’ll see anywhere from 20% to 40% of the produce cases are currently being labeled with a PTI-compliant label,” he said.

The bottom line: Where PTI is concerned, don’t be fooled by appearances, Vache said.

“If you took at a distant look at it, it doesn’t look like it moved very fast, but it was,” Vache said. “It’s like a duck that doesn’t seem to be going anywhere in the water, but beneath the water line that duck is paddling away. With PTI, there’s a lot going on under the water line.”

Others in the industry are weighing in on PTI with various opinions.

“I still say we’re all going in many different directions,” said Don Edgar, operations manager at Princeton, Fla.-based New Limeco LLC, which grows, packs and ships limes, mangoes, avocados and other tropical items.

“I believe there needs to be some type of legislative system in place that’s agreed upon,” he said.

Richard Lee, compliance coordinator with the Leamington-based Ontario Greenhouse Vegetable Growers Association, rated PTI as an excellent idea, but he recognizes there are roadblocks to universal compliance.

“We applaud any initiatives that are going to assist our members to provide the safest food to our customers, but I think they face some setbacks in implementing all the milestones and being where they want to be,” he said.

Some customers are adopting the PTI initiatives; others are requiring independent third-party certification; and some seem “comfortable with the way they’ve been doing businesses over the years,” Lee said.

Retailers hold the key to universal compliance, said Gary Wishnatzki, owner of technology-centric VirtualOne and Wish Farms, both based in Plant City, Fla.

“The only way I believe it’s going to reach its objective is if the major retailers demand it,” he said.

If they don’t, some in the industry likely will be, “we’re only going to take these extra steps if we have to,” Wishnatzki said.

He said he sympathizes with that attitude, looking at it from a cost point of view.

“My company sees the value of PTI,” he said.

Others do, too, but some of them will wait until they are forced to comply, Wishnatzki said.

“It won’t get to be standard practice until it gets demanded,” he said.


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight