Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Issue Announcement

Don’t fear the PDP

In late February, the U.S. Department of Agriculture released its 2011 Pesticide Data Program report, in which fresh and processed fruit and vegetables accounted for 82.3% of the total samples.

In it, USDA says U.S. food “does not pose a safety concern based upon pesticide residues.”

But the produce industry is well conditioned for what comes next: environmental scare tactics.

Data from the PDP, which began more than 20 years ago, has been used by the Washington, D.C.-based Environmental Working Group since 1995 to compile its “Dirty Dozen” list of produce with the most pesticide residues.

This used to be a dreaded time, as EWG would spread its message to consumers via the mainstream media about how dangerous pesticides are, and, by association, many fresh fruits and vegetables.

But work by produce industry trade groups and its partner, the Alliance for Food and Farming, has begun to balance EWG’s counter intuitive effort.

Within hours of USDA’s release, the alliance had issued the first release of its own.

It said the PDP report “clearly confirms that both conventional and organic fruits and vegetables are safe and that consumers should be eating more of both with confidence.”

The alliance even answers consumers’ possible concerns about pesticide residues, saying they should simply wash their fruits and vegetables before eating them.

Produce industry representatives should spend the next few weeks and months reminding consumers, through all media channels, what they already know to be true.

Of course fresh fruits and vegetables are good for consumers, whether they’re organic or conventional.

Did The Packer get it right? Leave a comment and tell us your opinion.


Comments (3) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Bradley Fitzhenry    
Report Abuse
February, 25, 2013 at 01:27 PM

Learn more about the Alliance for Food and Farming at http://www.foodandfarming.info/.
Also check out their consumer information site http://www.safefruitsandveggies.com/

Mischa Popoff    
Osoyoos BC  |  February, 26, 2013 at 07:19 PM

Dear Bradley Fitzhenry:
I've been trying to get in touch with someone at The Alliance for Food and Farming for quite some time now. Please go to my website and drop me a line: http://www.isitorganic.ca

All the best!

Mischa Popoff    
Report Abuse
Osoyoos BC  |  February, 26, 2013 at 07:16 PM

Right on Packer! You guys are finally getting it right when it comes to organic food.

Rather than running-down conventional food, pretending it's toxic as the Environmental Working Group does - hand-in-hand with countless other pro-organic lobby groups - it's time for the $30-billion per-annum American organic sector to stand up and prove itself. If organic food is better, do some tests and prove it!

Instead of requiring applicants to merely fill out paperwork and pay exorbitant fees, the organic industry should test all crops and livestock IN THE FIELD to ensure they're the real deal. Otherwise, all we'll continue to get is hype and negativity.

You can't sell a Fod by running down a Chev.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight