Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Food Safety & Traceability

FDA, OMB seek more time for food safety rules

Even with the White House Office of Management and Budget now sitting on several Food Safety Modernization Act rules for more than a year, the Food and Drug Administration wants the U.S. District Courts to provide the administration with more time.

In a late November motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed against the FDA and the Office of Management and Budget by the Center for Food Safety and the Center for Environmental Health seeking prompt FDA implementation of food safety rules, the FDA asked the U.S. District Court in Northern California to give it more time to implement complex and wide-ranging food safety regulations.

“FDA’s decisions regarding enforcement actions are not subject to judicial review, and the defendants have not, as a matter of law, unreasonably delayed the adoption of regulations implementing FSMA,” government lawyers argued in the motion.

The rules that the Office of Management and Budget has been reviewing for more than a year include Hazard Analysis and Risk Based Preventive Controls (under review at OMB since Nov. 22, 2011), the Foreign Supplier Verification Program (under review since Nov. 28 of 2011), the Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Benefit Preventive Controls for Food for Animals (under review at OMB since Dec. 5, 2011) and the Produce Safety Regulation (under review since Dec. 9, 2011).

Industry leaders have also been impatient with lack of movement by OMB on the food safety regulations.

Some have speculated the proposed rules were slowed by election-year politics. That reason no longer applies after the November election, but the rules continue to languish at OMB.

Now, Tom O’Brien, Washington, D.C.-based representative for the Newark, Del.-based Produce Marketing Association, said the Office of Management and Budget website http://1.usa.gov/Wo6cma shows the FDA in late November submitted the proposed regulation on accreditation of third parties to conduct food safety audits and for other purposes to the Office of Management and Budget.

“I don’t know if that review (by OMB) will take place in time for it to come out with the other (food safety regulations), but we don’t know when the others are coming out and it may be possible,” he said.

David Gombas, senior vice president of food safety and technology for Washington, D.C.-based United Fresh Produce Association, said Dec. 18 that the delay has become the number one question n the industry.

“A year is way too long to wait to see what these rules say,” Gombas said. “They are just proposed rules, so let’s get them out there and take a look at them already.”

Even knowing the reason for the long delay would be helpful, Gombas said.

In their lawsuit against the FDA and OMB, the Center for Food Safety and the Center for Environmental Health said the delay in the regulations is “unlawful” and they’re seeking a a court order that would require FDA to enact FSMA regulations by a court-imposed deadline and would prevent the OMB from delaying FDA’s compliance with that deadline.


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight