Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Packer Daily

FDA missed deadlines may continue

DALLAS — The Food and Drug Administration badly missed statutory deadlines in January for issuing food safety regulations this year, and significant hurdles remain before any produce safety rule will take effect.

The mammoth undertaking of overhauling U.S. food safety laws is no easy task, said David Durkin, principal with Olsson Frank Weeda Terman Matz PC. Durkin said some believe that if the produce safety rule is not issued by the end of May, it will not be issued until after the election this November.

Durkin and David Arvelo, small business representative for the Food and Drug Administration Southwest Regional Office, spoke at a May 1 workshop at the United Fresh Produce exposition. Arvelo did not speak about when the produce safety rule will be published.

While the FDA submitted the produce rule to the Office of Management and Budget in December, Durkin said it was not enough time for the OMB to feel comfortable with the rule before the January statutory deadline set by Congress.

An economic impact analysis of any federal regulation with more than a $100 million effect is required, and Durkin said that analysis is important because it could be used by opponents to challenge the rule. Separately, the FDA also must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis to certify to the Small Business Administration about the impact of the rule on the economy.

When the proposed food safety rules are published, Durkin said the agency will provide a minimum of 120 days for comment. After comments are received and responded to, the FDA will again submit the proposed rules to the Office of Management, which Durkin could mean another significant delay in the process.

Agencies, including the Office of the Trade Representative will also weigh in with their opinions about the proposed regulation, Durkin said.

Given the delays, Durkin said the industry will have plenty of time to make their voices heard about the effects of these proposed rules once they are published.


Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Brunhilde Merker, CEO    
Report Abuse
USA, FL  |  May, 07, 2012 at 04:49 PM

When I read this story it sounds like all the world has to wait for something surprising in food safety that has never been used before. The new food safety regulations are only some new updates to the old GAP’s and the FDA Bio-Terrorism law. Nothing is really new about how to produce safe food or feed. As everybody can read at the FDA website http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm261672.htm as the final rules are out since July 3, 2011. From this day on, FDA (FSMA) is able to detain food the agency believes has been produced under unsanitary or unsafe conditions. This sentence means that FDA expects from the industry to produce safe food/feed under sanitary conditions.
To suggest a false believe that there is all the time in the world to wait for something out of the ordinary is not a help for the industry members as we can see on daily FDA inspections and warning letters plus recalls. Just who has a interest in misleading members in the produce industry?

Here is what Dr. David Acheson says: Zero tolerance for unsafe food ...

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:omdQi5h7W34J:www.astaspice.org/files/public/AchesonApril23,2012ASTA.pdf+dr.+david+acheson+unsafe+food&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight