Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Packer Daily

CORRECTED: Pest protection to suffer with budget deficit

(CORRECTED): A $16 billion state budget shortfall in California will lead to cutbacks in border pest protection activities.

Dave Puglia, Sacramento-based senior vice president for Irvine, Calif.-based Western Growers. said California Department of Food and Agriculture Secretary Karen Ross briefed industry leaders May 14 with a plan that will require $2.5 million in cuts from the agriculture budget to deal with what he called a “rolling crisis.”

“It is very difficult to process another round of cuts to CDFA, minor though they may be on paper,” Puglia said.

Budget stresses have resulted in $31 million in cuts to the general fund support for the agriculture department in the last two years, he said. Those cuts represent about 30% of traditional general fund support for the department, Puglia said

“The vast majority of those cuts are coming out of the plant side of CDFA, not the animal side,” he said.

Puglia said Ross told industry leaders that the majority of the expected $2.5 million in cuts may come out of the state’s border inspection stations, potentially starting when the new fiscal year begins in July 1.

While Puglia credited the CDFA’s Ross for implementing creative strategies to keep border inspection stations open with rotating hours, he said additional cuts will hurt.

“Major pathways still have 24/7 coverage, but those back road entry ways into the state will probably see very little border station activity,” he said. “Our exposure (to pests and diseases) is being increased.”

Cutting $2.5 million from the CDFA budget will weaken protection for agriculture while not contributing much to solve the deficit crisis, he said.

“Every additional cut is deeper into the bone,” he said.

The lack of funds will put more pressure on the industry to fund programs, but Puglia said the state’s growers are already heavily burdened by fees and taxes not only from CDFA but other state agencies including the State Water Resources Control Board, Cal EPA and other agencies.

“The reality is that California farmers are already paying exorbitant fees to support state government programs,” he said.

The total pro CDFA budget in 2012-13 is proposed at $340 million, of which about $63 million comes from the state’s general fund, $106 million comes from the federal budget, $156 million comes from special/industry funds and $14 million is from reimbursements.

Puglia said the industry is talking about other strategies to raise funds for support of agriculture programs.

“Everyone should be coming to the realization that the general fund dollars are going away and we’ve got to figure out a mechanism to make sure we can adequately fund protection and eradication of invasive pests without all of the costs falling strictly on agriculture,” Barry Bedwell, president of the Fresno-based California Grape & Tree Fruit League, said in a comment about the crisis.


Note on correction: The original story cited budget cutbacks of $2.1 million at CDFA. The correct number is $2.5 million for 2012-13.


Comments (3) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

M. G.    
Report Abuse
Michigan  |  May, 16, 2012 at 09:11 AM

Rather than continue to tax those in California, which in my opinion is not working, levy an inspection fee applied to exports from the State and have ultimately those that consume the food pay for the cost of keeping your inspectcion stations open. This will increase cost but put the cost increase squarely on the shoulders of those that consume the food. Option Two - Close the stations until CA can afford to keep them open. Option Three - Keep the Stations open and exponse CA to bond defaults.

M.L.M    
Report Abuse
California  |  May, 16, 2012 at 11:02 AM

Why not stop all Ag products coming in across the Border which will
increase productivity in U.S. and eliminate Border Ag inspections

D.G.    
Report Abuse
California  |  May, 16, 2012 at 12:51 PM

The purpose of border inspections is to eliminate or at least mitigate the threat of pests, diseases, etc. from entering the state. I believe you would label this potential as external threats. Rather than burden the already over-taxed citizens of our once proud state with more fees, taxes, whatever...fund the inspections from the source of the threat...place a toll or fee on all incoming cars, trucks, planes, and ships entering the state and dedicate that reveune exclusively for the pest exclusion budget.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight