CORRECTED: Pest protection to suffer with budget deficit - The Packer

CORRECTED: Pest protection to suffer with budget deficit

05/15/2012 01:14:00 PM
Tom Karst

(CORRECTED): A $16 billion state budget shortfall in California will lead to cutbacks in border pest protection activities.

Dave Puglia, Sacramento-based senior vice president for Irvine, Calif.-based Western Growers. said California Department of Food and Agriculture Secretary Karen Ross briefed industry leaders May 14 with a plan that will require $2.5 million in cuts from the agriculture budget to deal with what he called a “rolling crisis.”

“It is very difficult to process another round of cuts to CDFA, minor though they may be on paper,” Puglia said.

Budget stresses have resulted in $31 million in cuts to the general fund support for the agriculture department in the last two years, he said. Those cuts represent about 30% of traditional general fund support for the department, Puglia said

“The vast majority of those cuts are coming out of the plant side of CDFA, not the animal side,” he said.

Puglia said Ross told industry leaders that the majority of the expected $2.5 million in cuts may come out of the state’s border inspection stations, potentially starting when the new fiscal year begins in July 1.

While Puglia credited the CDFA’s Ross for implementing creative strategies to keep border inspection stations open with rotating hours, he said additional cuts will hurt.

“Major pathways still have 24/7 coverage, but those back road entry ways into the state will probably see very little border station activity,” he said. “Our exposure (to pests and diseases) is being increased.”

Cutting $2.5 million from the CDFA budget will weaken protection for agriculture while not contributing much to solve the deficit crisis, he said.

“Every additional cut is deeper into the bone,” he said.

The lack of funds will put more pressure on the industry to fund programs, but Puglia said the state’s growers are already heavily burdened by fees and taxes not only from CDFA but other state agencies including the State Water Resources Control Board, Cal EPA and other agencies.

“The reality is that California farmers are already paying exorbitant fees to support state government programs,” he said.

The total pro CDFA budget in 2012-13 is proposed at $340 million, of which about $63 million comes from the state’s general fund, $106 million comes from the federal budget, $156 million comes from special/industry funds and $14 million is from reimbursements.

Puglia said the industry is talking about other strategies to raise funds for support of agriculture programs.

Prev 1 2 Next All

Comments (3) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

M. G.    
Michigan  |  May, 16, 2012 at 09:11 AM

Rather than continue to tax those in California, which in my opinion is not working, levy an inspection fee applied to exports from the State and have ultimately those that consume the food pay for the cost of keeping your inspectcion stations open. This will increase cost but put the cost increase squarely on the shoulders of those that consume the food. Option Two - Close the stations until CA can afford to keep them open. Option Three - Keep the Stations open and exponse CA to bond defaults.

California  |  May, 16, 2012 at 11:02 AM

Why not stop all Ag products coming in across the Border which will increase productivity in U.S. and eliminate Border Ag inspections

California  |  May, 16, 2012 at 12:51 PM

The purpose of border inspections is to eliminate or at least mitigate the threat of pests, diseases, etc. from entering the state. I believe you would label this potential as external threats. Rather than burden the already over-taxed citizens of our once proud state with more fees, taxes, the inspections from the source of the a toll or fee on all incoming cars, trucks, planes, and ships entering the state and dedicate that reveune exclusively for the pest exclusion budget.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight