Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Packer Daily

Analysis: PMA, United Fresh keep talking on merger

Three words said it all — and nothing.

With the e-mail message “talks are continuing,” Mike O’Brien, immediate past Produce Marketing Association chairman and vice president of produce and floral for Schnuck Markets Inc., St. Louis, summed up the status of merger discussions between United Fresh Produce Association and PMA.

Another e-mail from United Fresh came later: “After conferring with our board leaders, their only comment is that ‘talks between our associations are continuing.’”

United Fresh and PMA boards of directors members discussed the possible merger in a June 4 conference call that coincided with a PMA board meeting in Sonoma, Calif.

If nothing else illustrates the benefit of a unified national organization, it is perhaps these two e-mails.

In roles that are truly thankless so far, Steffanie Smith, former chief executive officer of River Point Farms, Hermiston, Ore., and immediate past chairwoman of United Fresh, and O’Brien have led a 12-member task force considering the merger.

They have not been able to share details of their work to find common ground between the two groups.

Redundant communications and duplicated efforts of PMA and United Fresh have led many industry leaders to believe the time is right for a merger of the two groups.

Sources said in May that large marketers have reportedly told United Fresh and PMA to find a way to get the deal done or they will pull their support from both groups.

Previous talks in the early 1990s and another set of talks 10 years ago didn’t make it to the finish line, but these current talks seem to have a better opportunity.

It is apparent that United Fresh and PMA leaders won’t share details of their discussions unless and until they have an agreement in hand. We assume those specifics will then be shared in detail.

If the agreement never comes, then the industry deserves to hear chapter and verse why the impulse to form a unified national trade organization again did not work out.

And members of both organizations deserve to know what’s going on and have some input.

Another three-word statement from PMA and United Fresh will not do.


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight