Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

News

PMA, United Fresh talk merger

See updated story: PMA, United Fresh merger talks continue.

The fates of the United Fresh Produce Association and the Produce Marketing Association could be determined.

The boards of directors of the two groups discussed, and possibly voted on, a merger of the two associations during a conference call June 4. The call coincided with a PMA board meeting in Sonoma, Calif.

No current member of either board or spokesmen for United Fresh and PMA would officially confirm the report.

One former United Fresh board member, speaking anonymously, said he was in support of the merger.

Having one national organization to represent the interests of the industry would be more efficient, he said.

“I don’t see the value of having two big organizations; it is a resource issue.”

Dues, travel expenses for multiple association events and staff travel time could be cut back if the groups merged he said.

The groups formed a 12-member task force in 2011 to consider the possibility of a merger.

Steffanie Smith, former chief executive officer of River Point Farms, Hermiston, Ore., and immediate past chairwoman of United Fresh, and Mike O’Brien, immediate past PMA chairman and vice president of produce and floral for Schnuck Markets Inc., St. Louis, have led the group considering the merger.

No specific details of the proposed merger have been released by the group.

In early May, Smith said the United Fresh board of directors had not voted on the merger. However, she said the dialogue was continuing, a sign the talks were making progress.

While the proposed merger seems to have fairly broad support in the industry, one industry leader said the challenge will be to convince the grower-shippers that their interests will be adequately represented by a combined organization. Another challenge will be sort out who should lead a merged national trade group.


Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Andreas Economou    
Report Abuse
Philadelphia  |  June, 07, 2012 at 09:18 AM

Support for the merger should only be based, if one of the main objective of the new association will be to support, endorse, and safeguard the welfare of the various USA produce businesses and their employees.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight