Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

News

What’s holding up food safety regulations?

Another page of the calendar, another deadline missed for the Food Safety Modernization Act implementation.

The Food and Drug Administration continues to miss deadlines set by Congress for the new food safety law.

In early July, 18 months after the massive food safety reform bill became law, the FDA was supposed to have implemented the preventive control requirement and established a voluntary qualified importer program.

Earlier this year, the FDA missed a Jan. 4 deadline to issue the produce safety regulation, preventive controls for food and feed, and a rule for foreign supplier verification.

While the FDA submitted the rules in December, the regulations are apparently still under review at the White House Office of Management and Budget. Some observers speculate the proposed rules are slowed by election-year politics or perhaps uncertainty on the cost-and-benefit analysis of the rules.

“Whoever is holding it up, it is not FDA and it is certainly not the industry,” said David Gombas, senior vice president of food safety and technology for Washington, D.C.-based United Fresh Produce Association,

Gombas said there are several more regulations still to be addressed, including lab accreditation and third-party accreditation. Both of those regulations have a deadline set by Congress of early 2013.

“The anticipation was that FDA would have an opportunity to see that the reaction was to the first four (deadlines) before these were published but (the FDA) continues to work on the other rules required by the Food Safety Modernization Act,” he said. “At this point they will bunch up in the qeuue and we’re not sure which one will appear first.”

Gombas said funding for FDA also remains a question, with the agency’s oversight responsibilities outpacing its budget.

“They continue to look at user fees, but I don’t see user fees as bridging that gap,” Gombas said.


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight