Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

News

UPDATED: Mango board working on GAPs in wake of recall

National Mango Board (UPDATED COVERAGE, Nov. 1) ANAHEIM, Calif. — The Food and Drug Administration is ramping up inspections of mangoes after a salmonella outbreak led to numerous recalls of Daniella brand mangoes from Mexico this summer.

William Watson, executive director of the National Mango Board, spoke about the recall to mango growers, importers and others during a reception at Fresh Summit 2012 sponsored by the Fresh Produce Association of the Americas.

He said the board is taking steps to ensure safe mangoes for consumers in the wake of the outbreak that sickened 127 people.

The board has undertaken risk assessments in Mexico, Ecuador, Brazil, Peru, Guatemala and the U.S. A scientific advisory board is being formed to review findings of the risk assessment and develop good agricultural practices — especially for post-harvest operations.

William WatsonWatson In a post-Fresh Summit interview on Oct. 31, Watson said he’s heard from mango industry representatives and FDA officials that food safety inspections by the agency have increased significantly for mango imports from all countries. Though he used the term “high risk commodity” in a statement to importers about FDA scrutiny earlier in October, Watson said he has not been officially informed by FDA that mangoes are a high risk.

“Inspections are going on more frequently, and I kind of assumed that it is because it is a high-risk item,” he said.

Watson said importers are concerned about longer hold times for mango inspections, with isolated reports of delays as long as 11 days.

Still, Watson said Mexican grower-packer Agricola Daniella is the only company on the FDA’s import alert list.

“The only import alert was for (Agricola Daniella) and they are done packing this year anyway,” he said.

Sebastian Cianci, FDA spokesman,  said the agency looks at the past history of problems with a product as one of the factors that is taken into consideration when determining which shipments to inspect. “In light of this, it is likely that other shipments of mangoes will be flagged for increased surveillance to ensure that similar violation is not present in the same or similar products.”

Even with the increased inspections and some loads being held, Watson said nearly 6 million boxes of Brazilian mangoes entered the U.S. since August. Watson said the safety record for the mango industry has been strong, with nearly 500 million boxes moving to the market since the previous foodborne outbreak linked to mangoes in 2003.

At Fresh Summit, Watson reminded mango producers and importers that board activities are limited by federal law. He said the board is working with the FDA to develop the GAPs, which should be available to the industry by winter 2013.

Recall review

During his Fresh Summit presentation, Watson said the commodity survived the recall with the support of retailers and the responsibility demonstrated by Larry Nienkerk, general manager of Splendid Products, which recalled the mangoes.

Despite the recall, and daily alerts from retailers and other companies pulling the fruit from distribution, Watson said the mango industry remains strong.

Watson praised retailers who stocked fruit through the recall. He said their support and the quick action taken by Splendid Products to voluntarily recall the mangoes.

Although Watson maintained an upbeat theme in his presentation, he admitted that the recall had taught the industry some tough lessons.

“I know now that there are things I would have done differently,” Watson said. “We could have been two or three days faster getting information out. The PLUs were a mess.”

Many consumers and mainstream news reporters were confused about the Price Look-Up codes listed initially by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency early in the recall. The mango board issued statements explaining that the PLUs relate to varieties and sizes of mangoes and not specific brands, but media reports had already done the damage.

One member of the audience said the confusion about the PLUs caused many in the mango industry to lose money unnecessarily because customers didn’t understand only one brand was involved in the recall. Watson apologized and said that the mango board is reviewing possible alternatives to avoid such confusion in the future.

Staff Writer Coral Beach contributed to this article.


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight