UPDATED: Mexican limes rejected over banned chemicals

05/13/2013 04:12:00 PM
Andy Nelson

limes fresh trends 2013  (UPDATED COVERAGE, 3:06 p.m., May 16) At least four shipments of Mexican limes bound for the U.S. have been rejected at the border after they tested positive for chemicals banned in the U.S. for limes, but volumes and prices had not been affected as of May 16.

Shipments contained the chemicals propargite or dimethoate, said Bret Erickson, president of the Mission-based Texas International Produce Association.

Limes are not on the Environmental Protection Agency’s approved exemption list for propargite, which is sold under the brand names Omite and Comite, or dimethoate. Loads that test positive must be destroyed or returned to the shipper.

Erickson said May 16 that volumes had not been affected by the rejected loads.

“It seems to be very limited,” he said.

Jeff Brechler, salesman for Edinburg, Texas-based J&D Produce, said May 16 none of J&D’s imports had been affected and he had not heard of loads being rejected.

In the week ending May 11, volumes were up over the same week the year before, and year-to-date volumes were comparable, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Lime prices have held steady at $30 a box for 40-pound cartons of 110s since April 23, according to the USDA.

Oranges, grapefruit and lemons are on the exemption list. Because U.S. lime production is so low, chemical companies did not invest the resources to get limes put on the list, Erickson said.

Erickson said the chemicals are widely used for controlling pests, mainly mites, in Mexican citrus production.

The association was scheduled to host a conference call with importers May 14 to discuss the chemicals and rejected loads, but it was postponed. It will likely be held the week of May 20 or the week of 27, Erickson said.



Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Gilbert    
Calexico Ca  |  May, 13, 2013 at 06:50 PM

I think we all agree on the federal controls for the use of not registered products which are of human health or environmental risk; however, a product not registered doesn't mean good or bad, in this case many times it means that registration is not profitable. There is a lack of interest on the chemical companies for the registration of low acreage crops which represent low earnings for them, and that is leaving many crops with very few options for pest or disease controls. The use of some new chemicals which are environmental and human friendly which work less agresive than many (old and registered) ones could be very benefial in the industry for new, future and very probably better cultural practices, but they are not registered because their lack of certification approval. What does it takes from the feds to get us better and safer registered products, will this happen some time???

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight