Today's Pricing

TOMATOES — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 14

CENTRAL AND SOUTH FLORIDA DISTRICTS — Shipments (433-454-398) — Movement expected to increase. Trading moderate. Prices 5x6s higher, others lower. Extra services included. 25-pound cartons loose mature-greens 85% U.S. 1 or better 5x6s $8.95-9.95, 6x6s $7.95-8.95, 6x7s $7.95-8.95. Quality generally good.

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (152-146-159, greenhouse 124-123-137, vine-ripes 28-23-22) — Movement expected to decrease seasonally. Supplies 4x4 to 4x5s light. Trading 4x4 to 4x5s fairly active, others slow. Prices 4x4 to 4x5s higher, others generally unchanged. Field-grown and greenhouse cartons/flats two-layer 4x4s mostly $9-10, 4x5s mostly $7.95-9, 5x5s mostly $4.99-5, 5x6s $4.64-5. Quality variable.

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH OTAY MESA, CALIF. — Crossings (8-8-11, greenhouse 7-7-9, vine-ripes 1-1-2) — Movement expected to increase seasonally. Supplies in too few hands to establish a market. Quality generally good. The first f.o.b. report was expected to be issued the week of May 21.

WEST FLORIDA DISTRICT — Shipments (0-0-0) — Light harvest expected to start the week of May 28. Expect first f.o.b. by the first week of June.

U.S. SHIPPING POINTS — Greenhouse (54-56-**) — No prices reported. **unavailable

CANADA SHIPPING POINTS — Greenhouse (149*-150-**) — No prices reported. **unavailable, *revised 



  • The USDA has reported proceedings against these companies — See more...
  • RBCS has recently changed the credit rating
    on these companies — See more...
  • RBCS has reported profile changes for these companies — See more...

News

Budget cuts threaten California pest eradication

The severity of the state’s budget crisis could carve another $12 million from the California Department of Food and Agriculture and jeopardize its on-going, but successful, programs against invasive pests.

The cuts, revealed Jan. 5 in Gov. Jerry Brown’s proposed Fiscal Year 2013 budget, would be on top of the $19 million trimmed from the agency’s budget this year.

One program not likely to be affected is the campaign to control the Asian citrus psyllid, the pest that can carry the terminal disease, huanglongbing.

“The operations program, the boots on the ground program, is not impacted by these budget cuts, because it’s all industry funded,” said Ted Batkin, president of the Citrus Research Board, Visalia. “But there are going to be some serious cuts to our overall invasive species defensive posture in that they’re looking to reduce the border station diligence by a significant amount.”

Brown’s proposed budget calls for a nearly $4.4 million reduction in the CDFA’s $20 million border inspection program.

Barry Bedwell, president of the Fresno-based California Grape & Tree Fruit League, likened the reduced border security to having a police officer stationed periodically on a corner.

“He’s not going to be there every day, but if people don’t know when he’s there, they are still going to be watchful of running the red light,” he said.

The border inspection cuts could affect a wide range of the state’s fruit and vegetable crops.

“That’s a negative for not just the citrus industry, but for all of agriculture,” said Joel Nelsen, president of California Citrus Mutual, Exeter. “There is always an opportunity for invasive pests, whether they be (Asian citrus psyllid) or medfly or the date palm weevil; that’s the problem.”

While the CDFA budget cut was not unexpected, Bedwell said the clock continues to run on the state’s failure to plan for properly funding invasive pest programs. Since keeping pests from damaging California crops benefits nearly everyone — retailers, the nursery industry, consumers and agriculture, funding has traditionally come from the state’s general fund, he said.

The focus for the balance of 2012, Bedwell said, is to create a mechanism to reach the maximum amount of people to properly fund these programs and replace the general fund dollars.

“Agriculture needs to pay its fair share,” he said. “The immediate challenge that I think many of us in agriculture are going to have to try to come forth with is ideas on how we reach the most consumers possible to help fund these programs. Not everyone’s going to be pleased with the solution.”

There could be in the coming months numerous changes in the governor’s budget. What is known as the governor’s budget revise must by law be forwarded to the Legislature in May. The state constitution requires the lawmakers to approve a balanced budget by July 1, a date they have routinely ignored.


 

Comments (1)

Leave a comment 
Name (required)
e-Mail (required)
Location (required)

Comment:

RobertWilliams

Report Abuse
San Francisco  |  January, 20, 2012 at 03:28 PM

CDFA NOT AS ADVERTIZED

The CDFA is a captured agency. It is controlled by large chemical companies that sell pesticides, and to a lesser degree the dairy industry.

The CDFA promotes pesticide sales and they use the fear of invasive pests to do so.

The CDFA also constantly harasses the raw milk producers that are our highest quality and integrity producers to maintain the unhealthy pasteurized milk factory industry.

The theory of protecting ourselves from invasive pests is fine. But in practice the CDFA intentionally allows them to enter or fabricates the danger of pests in order to apply (increase sales for those who control the CDFA) greater amounts of pesticides throughout the State of California.

To solve the problem, the Executive Management at CDFA have to be thrown out. Many of the employees are decent people and could stay on, but the executive management has to go for this organization to b legitimate.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight