Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

News

Consumer fears about produce safety rise, poll suggests

Pamela Riemenscheider U.S. consumers appear to be less worried about food safety in general but more concerned about fruit and vegetable safety in particular.

A new poll from NPR and Thomson Reuters shows that 57% of consumers say they are concerned or very concerned about food safety, down from 61% who responded that way in the summer of 2010.

Fresh produce on the other hand, showed an elevated level of concern among consumers. The poll showed that 30% of consumers say fruits and vegetables pose the greatest risk, compared with 23% with that view last year.

Meat leads the list of foods that people worry about most, the poll showed. Of those polled, 44% said meat is the food that posses the greatest risk, which NPR said was down 7% from a year ago.

The poll, conducted the first two weeks of July and reflecting the answers of more than 3,000 consumers, indicated that 11% of those polled say they were sickened by something they ate in the previous three months, similar to last year.

However, a greater percentage — 22% this year versus 12% in 2010 — said the illness was fairly serious, according to an NPR report of the poll.

The survey showed higher-income consumers were less concerned about food safety than those with a lower incomes.

The poll found that 53% of those making less than $25,000 per year said they were very concerned about food safety, compared with just 39% for those making $100,000 a year.


Comments (2) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Rich    
Report Abuse
New York  |  September, 15, 2011 at 05:17 PM

Thank you news media!

Charles Jordan    
Report Abuse
Colorado  |  September, 15, 2011 at 06:10 PM

Some politicians seem to want to eliminate the EPA. If the public is concerned about food safety, then what do you think it will be with not EPA and other such agencies?

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight