Judge rules all California almonds must be pasteurized - The Packer

Judge rules all California almonds must be pasteurized

01/25/2012 11:16:00 AM
Mike Hornick

A federal judge has ruled against a California organic grower who challenged a 2007 regulation requiring pasteurization of almonds sold on the domestic market.

Known as the salmonella rule, it was developed by the Almond Board of California in response to outbreaks earlier in the decade and implemented by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

In Washington, D.C., U.S. District Court Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle ruled Jan. 18 in a suit brought by Nick Koretoff Ranches, Fresno, Calif., against USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack.

Fifteen almond growers and handlers participated in earlier legal challenges. As they saw it, the policy hands over domestic market share to unpasteurized imports from Spain and Italy.

Steve Koretoff, general manager at Kerman, Calif.-based Purity Organics, estimates the rule cost his business at least $250,000 in lost sales the first year and more since.

“We still have an unlevel playing field,” he said. “We’re at a disadvantage compared to anybody in the raw foods movement. People are buying our competitors’ product when they could be buying it from us and we’re right in their back yard.”

In her 30-page ruling, the judge found the pasteurization requirement consistent with the almond marketing order’s outgoing quality control provisions.

“Because the salmonella rule ensures that only salmonella-free almonds are sold, it is not unreasonable for (Vilsack) to have deemed it a minimum quality requirement that contributes to orderly marketing and serves the public interest,” Huvelle wrote.

“The summary judgment we had hoped for would have said the Almond Board of California and the USDA did not have the legal authority to rule on quality as it pertains to bacterial contaminants,” said Will Fantle, co-director of Wisconsin-based The Cornucopia Institute, which helped coordinate the legal action.

California organic almond growers respect food safety concerns, Steve Koretoff said, despite opposing the rule.

“We’re in this dilemma where we think people should be able to buy raw food if they want, but at the same time we need to be conscious of how a potential outbreak would affect our market,” he said. “We asked the board for mandatory sampling rather than mandatory pasteurization. If any product had a presumptive positive test, then you’d pasteurize that lot. The board for whatever reason didn’t feel that was an adequate safety net.

“It seems to me that if this was truly a public health issue, all almonds sold in the U.S. would have to fall under the rules and regulations California product is subject to.”

Prev 1 2 Next All

Comments (3) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Natalie Rothgarden    
Chicago, IL  |  January, 26, 2012 at 02:47 PM

It's unfortunate that Californian's can't sell their raw food products. I agree that it's an unfair playing field. There should be a way to set up some regulations so there won't be worries of outbreaks from raw foods. The raw food movement is growing, and people want their raw foods. They know they can get perfectly high quality raw almonds, why why should the producers if Caifornia not have the option of providing that? Check out my raw review blog at rawfoodland.com!

Bill Lachenal    
London England  |  May, 14, 2012 at 10:34 AM

Soak raw almonds in jar one. Soak pasteurised almonds in jar two. Let rest for a week. Show to judge.

Chris G    
Boston MA  |  May, 15, 2012 at 06:29 PM

Sad how I need another adult to tell me how to eat - as if I could not read a label. A is pasteurized B is not -

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight