Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

News

Recalled Chamberlain cantaloupes did not have lot numbers

(For additional information, please see "Cantaloupe growers frestrated; guidelines expected soon")

cantaloupe The owners of Chamberlain Farms, as well as some federal officials, say media reports have not accurately reflected some of their statements about the ongoing 21-state salmonella outbreak linked to cantaloupe from the Owensville, Ind., farm.

Tim Chamberlain told The Packer that he “doesn’t know for sure” if his cantaloupe is the source of salmonella that has sickened 147 people and contributed to the deaths of two Kentuckians. Some media reported Chamberlain had told them his cantaloupe were not contaminated.

“I haven’t told anybody that my melons were ‘not the source’ — I said I didn’t know,” Chamberlain said Aug. 24. “I don’t know anything yet. We are still waiting on test results from FDA.”

Shelly Burgess, a spokeswoman for the Food and Drug Administration, said Aug. 24 “we do not have an ETA yet on the test results.”

Burgess also said the agency is advising consumers to not eat cantaloupe from Chamberlain Farms. Some media reports said the FDA has warned against all Indiana cantaloupes, but Burgess said Chamberlain Farm cantaloupes are the only ones the agency has identified.

The FDA is continuing its work on a list of specific distributors and retailers who received Chamberlain’s cantaloupes, but was not ready to release it as of mid-day Aug. 24. Burgess said only some of the Chamberlain cantaloupes had identifying stickers, but some did not. She referred other traceability questions to the farm.

Neither the FDA nor Chamberlain has information on how many cantaloupes were shipped from June 21 to Aug. 16. Chamberlain voluntarily started withdrawing his cantaloupes Aug. 16 after health officials contacted him about the possibility they were contaminated with salmonella.

Chamberlain said the cantaloupes did not have any lot numbers when he shipped them to retailers and wholesalers in southwest Indiana and southern Illinois. He said the farm does not have a test-and-hold policy.

FDA officials continue to investigate the outbreak with the help of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Notices from both agencies stress that there may be more than one source of the salmonella, but they did not provide details about what the other sources could be.


Comments (4) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Lalo Sandoval    
Report Abuse
Gonzales Ca  |  August, 24, 2012 at 08:02 PM

Beverly Hillbillies

How Can any Grocery Chain purchase melons from Jed Clampett and Company?

D Mills    
GA.  |  August, 25, 2012 at 12:19 PM

This has been going on for so many years, some of us follow all Food Saftey rules and then some don"t as we have seen, I think the retailers that buys from growers without the proper GMP and GAP guide lines in place should be held accountable also!!!!!

Anon    
Report Abuse
USA  |  August, 27, 2012 at 09:36 AM

Certain growers are doing their part in food safety, and others are cutting corners...
the retailers need to know who they're buying from, who has certs and audits, and
who is up to speed with their recall procedures if the worst were to happen. Maybe
they'll start to think twice when they chase that $1-2 deal from "vendor C", and
realize that vendors "A" and "B" may have a higher price because they've done their
work to ensure they have the safest possible fruit they can offer... all that costs a
pretty penny in our industry today, and it's unfortunate it's not recognized more
throughout the industry. with that being said, unfortunate things can happen to
anyone... but with all that has happened in the last few years with food safety issues,
more and more retailers SHOULD put more emphasis and importance on their real
relationships, and how seriously those people are taking these issues.

mills    
Report Abuse
GA.  |  August, 27, 2012 at 02:49 PM

agreed you couldn't have said it better, plus then you have brokers that have a cooler certifcation qualifying there growers under them that is awful, when they know the smaller growers aren't practicing anything nor washing, tracking there fields, no water test you name it!

All this is doing is hurting all of us that is doing things correctly like said it cost us alot of money to keep someone staff just to maintain the Food Safety Programs.. hopefully the retailers will start opening there eyes and make sure there QA's are doing there jobs or even there Food Safety Director

As said its unfortunate for anyone to have to go through issues of this nature!

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight