Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

News

UPDATED: No consumer produce wash consistently better than water

(UPDATED COVERAGE, Aug. 30) When consumers wash fresh produce at home, fruit and vegetable washes may work better than water at protecting them from certain diseases on certain commodities. But in general, no solution works better than water, according to a new study.

And one of the study’s authors said that, with the possible exception of people who have compromised immune systems, consumers are better off sticking with water.

The study only considered methods of cleaning produce in consumers’ homes.

Researchers Jillian D. Fishburn, Yanjie Tang and Joseph F. Frank published their findings in the August edition of Food Protection Trends, a publication of the Des Moines, Iowa-based International Association For Food Protection.

Frank, a food science and technology professor at the University of Georgia, said that for people with compromised immune systems, some commercially-available washes could be worth the money, depending on the commodity it’s used on.

But he also said those people are probably better off not eating raw produce in the first place. And for everyone else, the best bet is still water.

“I really couldn’t recommend that consumers purchase any of these technologies,” he said. “I’m more comfortable saying, ‘Wash it in water and be done with it.’”

The researchers studied a variety of washes that use compounds including electrolyzed oxidizing water, ozone and commercial vegetable wash (food-grade soap). The researchers also washed produce in chlorine bleach, and with plain tap water.

The various washing methods were used to attempt to remove E. coli 0157, listeria and salmonella from tomatoes, broccoli, cantaloupe, lettuce, spinach and green onions.

The study found that electrolyzed oxidizing water, or EO, proved more effective against some diseases than ozone, vegetable washes or tap water. But while it was more effective than chlorine for treating infected lettuce, EO was less effective than chlorine for treating cantaloupe.

“Some treatments were more effective than running tap water for specific pathogen-produce combinations, but no treatment produced greater reductions than tap water for all tested combinations,” the researchers wrote.

 


Comments (3) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Joseph Frank    
Report Abuse
University of Georgia  |  August, 29, 2012 at 02:14 PM

I wish to clarify our results quoted in the article. Our study applies to consumers
washing produce with running water in the kitchen sink. For farm or industrial purposes
and sanitizing agent must be used to kill pathogens that may cross contaminate during
washing. There are many good sanitizing chemicals than can be used to make sure your
wash water remains free of pathogens.

Andy Nelson    
The Packer  |  August, 30, 2012 at 09:10 AM

Thanks, Dr. Frank. I updated the story to make clear that your study covered consumer washes only.

rcw709    
Report Abuse
texas  |  September, 01, 2012 at 12:55 AM

what about hydrogen peroxide?

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight