Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

News

Pre-FDA food safety meeting generates 'passion'

click image to zoomUnited  Fresh Produce Assn. discusses food safety.Courtesy United Fresh Produce Assn.United Fresh Produce Association members on Feb. 27 discuss the Food and Drug Administration's proposed regulations as part of the Food Safety Modernization Act. United Fresh plans to comment on the proposed rules at a Feb. 28 public hearing in Washington, D.C. (UPDATED COVERAGE, Feb. 28) The Food and Drug Administration’s first meeting on proposed food safety rules will be Feb. 28-March 1, and a closer look at the proposed regulations has generated plenty of passion, one industry leader said.

Before the FDA meeting, the United Fresh Produce Association convened two working groups Feb. 27 in Washington, D.C., to discuss the FDA’s proposed rules. United Fresh officials will comment on the rules at the FDA’s Feb. 28 meeting, said Ray Gilmer, vice president of communications.

Gilmer said that the working groups — one addressing the produce safety rule and the other examining the preventive control safety rule for food facilities — had spirited discussions Feb. 27.

The groups exposed some concerns about FDA assumptions about the science of the proposed regulations, Gilmer said.

In testimony Feb. 28, David Gombas, United Fresh’s senior vice president of food safety and technology, said the industry remains concerned about exemptions for smaller operations. In addition, he said there are concerns on how the produce safety rule will relate to other rules coming from the FDA.

The FDA has public comment meetings on the proposed food safety rules, March 11 in Chicago and March 27 in Portland, Ore.

The United Fresh groups plan to meet online or in person just before each of those meetings

“It may depend on how much progress we’re making in the next couple of days,” Gilmer said Feb. 27.


Comments (3) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Wayve    
Report Abuse
TN  |  February, 28, 2013 at 03:00 PM

How do we as farmers comment on this? The regulation that we would have to either
chlorinate our irrigation water or test weekly is ridiculous and financially prohibitive. Our
highest CFB count last year was 11!

Gary    
Report Abuse
Dinuba  |  February, 28, 2013 at 11:14 PM

When will it stop. Between the global gap insanity and the FDA, maybe its time we just get all our produce from other countries so we dont have to worry about food safety. Oh I forgot, that food comes from the grocery store.

Janice    
Report Abuse
Ellijay, Ga  |  March, 05, 2013 at 09:10 AM

Great! More regulations. More inspectors. More useless government jobs.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight