Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Foodservice

Study: Higher nutrition standard for snacks a win-win for schools

Soon-expected U.S. Department of Agriculture updated nutrition standards for snack foods and beverages could help trim students’ waistlines, boost fruit and vegetable consumption and improve school revenue, a new study claims.

Replacing a candy bar with an apple could have a big effect, according to the 172-page health assessment released by the Kids’ Safe & Healthful Foods Project and the Health Impact Project,

The study found that implementing strong snack and a la carte food and beverage policies meeting 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans will cut students’ access to (and consumption of) unhealthy foods and beverages.

“The evidence would suggest that when it does get published, and finalized and implemented, that it stands to have a very positive impact on children’s health without having a negative impact on school districts’ budgets,” said Jessica Donze Black, director of the Kids’ Safe & Healthful Foods Project.

Both the Health Impact Project and the Kids’ Safe & Healthful Foods Project are joint efforts of the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation,

The study found that schools and districts with strong nutrition standards for snack and a la carte foods and beverages did not experience a decrease in revenue overall when they exercised tighter control on school snacks.

“In most instances, school foodservice revenues increased due to higher participation in school meal programs,” according to the study.

The study recommends that USDA establish nutrition standards for all foods sold regularly at schools and that those standards include age-appropriate calorie limits and restrictions on sugar and fat for snack food sold in schools. The study also recommends that the USDA provide technical assistance and training to school officials. In addition, the USDA should provide clear guidance on how the terms “infrequent,” “school day,” and “school campus,” as included in the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act, should be addressed.

Donze Black said it was likely that USDA will at least propose limits on calories, fat, sodium or sugar and seek comments.

She said the USDA should support sales of foods that kids need to eat more of, including fruits and vegetables, low-fat dairy and other healthy foods.

While the USDA rule on competitive food has been expected for some time and is a requirement of the Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010, Lorelei DiSogra, vice president of nutrition and health for the Washington, D.C.-based United Fresh Produce Association, said it is unclear when the agency will issue the proposed regulation.

DiSogra said some nutrition advocates expect the proposed rule will be issued before November, while others are skeptical that the White House will move before the election and risk negative publicity.

DiSogra said the new rule could provide a boost to the industry.

“It is going to open up new sales marketing opportunities for fresh and fresh cut fruits and vegetables because it has to follow the Dietary Guidelines and improve the school food environment,’ she said. “I think it is going to be very important for fresh produce.”

Donze Black said it is “imperative” that the USDA moves on the regulation as quickly as possible.

“What the study shows is that we can’t afford to wait given the health crisis we are in with children, and school districts will be able to afford to make the changes,” she said.


Prev 1 2 Next All


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight