Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Handling & Distributing

Rapid food tests can’t match culture tests’ accuracy

Tests for foodborne pathogens in which a culture is not grown in a lab may be necessary for produce companies, but they can’t replace traditional culture tests, industry leaders and government officials say.

Nonculture diagnostic tests have been around since the early 1980s, said David Gombas, senior vice president of food safety and technology for the Washington D.C.-based United Fresh Produce Association.

But there has been a recent push, Gombas said, to use them to replace culture tests that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration and other agencies and organizations rely on to accurately diagnose cases of salmonella, E. coli and other foodborne illnesses.

That trend was highlighted in a recent article in Scientific America magazine, which found that many clinics and state-run labs are turning to nonculture tests, which are faster than culture tests.

They’re faster, but are they better?

“Right now, the answer is no,” Gombas said. “CDC, FDA, and those in the produce industry I talk to — they want a live bug.”

A live bug is the result of growing a culture, which can take 18 to 24 hours in a lab, Gombas said. Some of the rapid nonculture tests, by contrast, can be done in 20 minutes.

For many fresh produce companies, like Earthbound Farm, San Juan Batista, Calif., rapid nonculture tests are a necessity, said Will Daniels, Earthbound’s senior vice president of operations and organic integrity.

“Without them, we wouldn’t be able to do what we do,” Daniels said. “A culture is a three to five day process. We can’t fit that into our system.”

Earthbound Farms tests every product it ships. If it relied on culture tests and had to wait three to five days to ship, it would need to have five to six days’ worth of inventory on hand at any given time, Daniels said.

As it is, the company’s warehouse is packed with just a day’s worth of inventory, he said. And of course shelf life would suffer significantly once product did finally ship.

“Speed is only a benefit in these things,” Daniels said.

Nevertheless, Daniels understands that CDC needs culture tests to do its epidemiology tests. Likewise, Gombas realizes that individual companies don’t have the time to make cultures.

“For places that have to be fast, it works,” Gombas said. “But when you have to be right, maybe not.”

 


Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Ben    
Report Abuse
USA  |  December, 26, 2012 at 01:20 PM

ATP test are tests to find out if there is a problem. If doesn't show up, there is no need to do a culture test. No produce company can hold everything back for days to find out nothing is wrong with. This is a discussion off the beaten path.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight