Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Handling & Distributing

Supreme Court considers whether to hear grape, raisin cases

California Table Grape Commission The U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether to hear a case regarding grape patents held by the California Table Grape Commission.

The Court was scheduled to decide on the case Nov. 20, but that decision wasn’t immediately available.

The court did, however, agree to hear a case this term challenging the federal raisin marketing order, which requires handlers who process and pack raisins to keep part of their product in reserve.

Attorney Brian Leighton who is representing Marvin and Laura Horne, owners of Raisin Valley Farms Marketing LLC, Fresno, Calif., said Nov. 21 the Supreme Court will likely hear oral arguments in the case in March 2013.

Leighton also represents the grape growers who are challenging the patents. Those companies are Delano Farms Co., Delano, Calif.; Gerawan Farming Inc., Reedley, Calif.; and Four Star Fruit Inc., Delano, Calif.

Kathleen Nave, president of the California Table Grape Commission, said Nov. 21 the Supreme Court could announce its decision on whether to hear the grape patent case in the coming days.

Nave said another case involving the commission’s assessments for promotions and marketing that has been in the California state court system for several years is scheduled for trial in June. The same grape growers who are challenging the patents filed the assessment case.

Oral arguments for summary judgment in the table grape assessment case, which would basically end the proceeding if granted, were set for Nov. 20, but the judge in Fresno County Superior Court announced Nov. 19 those arguments would have to wait until April.

The case in the Fresno County court questions whether the assessment is legal under the California Constitution.

A 1996 federal court case questioning the legality of the grape commission’s assessment under the U.S. Constitution — filed by the same grape growers — was handled by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2010, which ruled in favor of the assessment.


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight