Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Handling & Distributing

Traceability challenges at packing level worth conquering

Whether you are field packing, using a small open-air shed or running multiple lines in a high-tech facility, the challenges of traceability labeling are worth conquering, according to produce industry leaders.

A recent case history documented a strawberry packer who saw quality claims drop so much that the cost of implementing of Produce Traceability Initiative labeling was completely offset, said Ed Treacy, vice president of supply chain efficiencies for the Produce Marketing Association.

In an educational video on the PMA website, Treacy discusses several companies’ experiences and the unanticipated benefits they discovered when implementing PTI labeling at the point of packing.

The addition of traceability labels at the strawberry operation allowed the company to track which of three picking crews packed which fruit.

“They posted the results daily on which picking crew had what percentage of rejects from their customers,” Treacy says in the video.

“They never disciplined the employees, but what they found was … the crews started getting competitive with each other and they brought the total (quality) claims down from around 5% to less than 1%. That gain of 4% paid for their entire cost of PTI implementation.”

Smaller growers’ concerns

Traceability at the packing level can be tricky, though, said Todd Baggett, chief executive officer of technology provider RedLine Solutions, Santa Clara, Calif., during a recent Web seminar aimed at smaller packing operations.

Baggett said smaller packers with volumes of 2,000 to 3,000 cartons a day or less often express concerns that PTI compliance would be too complicated or too expensive for them.

He cited examples of listeria and salmonella outbreaks linked to small cantaloupe growing-packing operations last year and this year as examples of why traceability is vital.

Baggett said it is crucial for packers to use lot numbers that are date specific, if a lot takes more than one day to pack.

One packer attending the online seminar questioned the necessity of the specific pack date if the commodity is from a single lot. Baggett said there are so many variables in packing operations, such as wash water testing and changing, that date-specific information can be invaluable during inspections, audits or recalls.

Treacy said companies have documented reductions in over- and under-selling as well as reductions in shrink because delivery scheduled can be based on when a commodity was packed rather than when a truck showed up at a dock.


Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Ted Schultze    
Report Abuse
Minnesota  |  October, 31, 2012 at 09:27 AM

There is no requirement that the "specific pack date" be included in the PTI batch/date data requirement. This is a COMMON misconception that is, in my opinion, fostered by some in the industry who have a specific product or service they are trying to sell. Any batch/lot number that the packer/shipper wishes to use will work as long as they can trace the batch/lot number back into their system and determine where and when it came from. It might be noted that a license plate approach to batch/lot numbering works for many and that option gives the packer/shipper more label printing options than print on demand which is the most expensive option.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight