Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Retail

UPDATED: Mexican mangoes recalled in Canada; several sick

For additional information about U.S. recalls and salmonella cases linked to the Daniella mangoes, please see "U.S. distributor, retailers recall Daniella mangoes"and "United Supermarkets joins mango recall"

Recalled Daniella brand mango from MexicoNorth American Produce Sales, Vancouver, British Columbia, voluntarily recalled an unknown number of Daniella brand mangoes from Mexico because of possible salmonella contamination. (UPDATED COVERAGE, Aug. 27) Canadian officials updated a public warning about Mexican mangoes, identifying Daniella brand as those being recalled by distributor North American Produce Sales because of possible salmonella contamination.

Several illnesses have been confirmed in relation to consumption of the fruit, according to the Canadian government.

The Daniella mangoes were sold individually. Their stickers included the Price Look-Up code of 4959 and other information, according to the Canadian Food inspection Agency. Retailers sold the mangoes between July 12 and August 14.

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency posted the original voluntary recall notice from the Vancouver, British Columbia-based distributor Aug. 24.

The CFIA updated notice said the fruit "may have been" distributed in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Northwest Territories, Nunavut and Yukon.

The CFIA notice did not include any other traceability information. Officials at the distributor were not immediately available for comment.


Comments (7) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Fernando de Saracho    
Report Abuse
Nogales Az  |  August, 24, 2012 at 03:17 PM

Letter to Editor:

Why would you authorize to run an article without giving specifics as to the label(s), &
retailer (s) involved?

What motivates The Packer to write with such irresponsibility?


You do realize that by dong this you are deliberately segregating an entire country's specific
commodity?

I understand that sometimes the complete information is not available, and also
understand that sensationalist news such as 'recalls' in the food industry attract readers, I
do not however coincide that a story with such poor investigation merits publication due to
the damages that it already has done merely to 'publish'.

Providing obscure information to mass media tool such as The Packer, it's beyond obtuse.

Coral Beach    
August, 24, 2012 at 03:26 PM

Fernando -- As The Packer's story states, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency recall notice did not include any other traceability information.

Here is the link to the recall notice:http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/corpaffr/recarapp/2012/20120824e.shtml

No one at the distributor was available to talk with me when I called seeking additional information, as stated in the story. -- Coral Beach, staff writer

Fernando    
Report Abuse
Nogales  |  August, 24, 2012 at 03:39 PM

I dont believe that i offended any one by asking questions that i believe raise awareness and goes to prove how mass media educates public, why would you erase my comments?

Chris Koger    
Report Abuse
Lenexa, Kan.  |  August, 25, 2012 at 08:23 AM

Fernando,

Your comment was not deleted. Although our system allows comments to be posted without prior approval by us, sometimes a comment is flagged and held for approval because it contains a banned word.

Most of the time, as in this case, it's a misspelled word or typo. I have approved your comment, and we apologize for the delay.

Chris Koger
News Editor

William    
Report Abuse
Mcallen  |  August, 26, 2012 at 10:43 AM

You are right Fernando; that's how the Tomato INDUSTRY was hit a couple of years ago;
due to misinformation; and at the end there was no one to blame! But all this
misinformation left us a destroyed tomato industry;

IG    
Report Abuse
Houston  |  August, 27, 2012 at 08:39 AM

I've always said this internet and social media era has created a thirst for pop
journalism. As long as advertising revenue is based on clicks or unique visitors we will
have this type of reporting.

Ben    
Report Abuse
USA  |  August, 28, 2012 at 04:17 PM

By looking at the sticker it says Product of Mexico. Which grower grew those contaminated mangos or who contaminated it on the way to the consumer? Does the barcode in sticker tells you all the secrets? As far as I can see the barcode only tells you it is a Mango with a brand name. That's the problem!

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight