Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Know Your Market

Dealers say marketing agreement an asset for selling Ohio produce

Food safety can be a useful marketing tool, and it doesn’t have to cost a lot, according to organizers of the Ohio Produce Marketing Agreement.

The OPMA is a self-described grassroots effort that includes a network of Ohio growers who execute standards and inspections that members say are “realistic, sensible and affordable.”

The program has several levels that suit growing operations of various scopes, functions and business models, according to Lisa Schacht, president of the board of directors of the Columbus-based Ohio Produce Growers & Marketers Association, which developed the program.

“The need for that program is significant because there’s a real concern to address the issue of foodborne illness,” Schacht said.

The advantage to OPMA is it can adjust to the needs of different members, Schacht said.

“Just like the California Leafy Greens tried to push the national leafy greens, there was concern that a region wouldn’t be able to comply, and we thought we needed to have something that was a little more suitable for our area,” she said.

OPMA serves that need, she said.

“What we need now is that it could be recognized by that and pushed for a certification program for growers,” Schacht said.

The costs of larger-scale certification programs are not a problem with OPMA, Schacht said.

“They’re exceptional producers and have good quality product that could be in stores if distributors were satisfied by a certification program like the produce marketing agreement,” she said.

The agreement is still in its development stages, but it is progressing through the state legislature, Schacht said.

“Ohio didn’t have a legislative vehicle in our revised code for marketing agreements to be established,” she said.

The industry expects that it will have no problems getting the backing of state government, Schacht said.

“Once we have that in place, we can finalize the marketing agreement and hopefully see it move much quicker,” she said.

OPMA hasn’t pushed up sales, but it could be an important step for Ohio’s industry, said Bill Schuler, president and chief executive officer of the Wilder, Ky.-based Castellini Group.

“I applaud the effort of the Ohio farmers committee trying to get out front and develop their own marketing agreement, but at the end of the day, it’s got to meet standards set forth by the Food Safety and Modernization Act, which I know it will,” he said.

Tony DiNovo, president of Columbus-based wholesaler DNO Inc., said he believes strongly in the OPMA.

“We were pushing it ... because traceability is an important part of our business,” he said.

The company is trying to get smaller growers to comply, with some success, DiNovo said.

“We feel it’s taking us in the right direction,” he said.


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight