Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Marketing Profiles

California Strawberry Commission assesses food safety

The California Strawberry Commission is in the midst of its second food safety risk assessment.

The commission itself — not third-party auditors — is doing the assessment, following the harvest gradually from south to north. The work began in late 2011, and should be completed sometime this year.

The last California strawberry food safety assessment was done in 2008. It covered everything from nurseries to soil preparation, pre- and post-harvest, transportation and distribution.

There’s a narrower focus this time around.

“We’re repeating mostly the parts that are in the field because that’s where we feel our greatest risk is,” said Carolyn O’Donnell, communications director for the Watsonville-based commission.

The field issues are the major potential sources of foodborne illness singled out by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and others: water, wildlife, compost and labor.

“We have a hand-harvested crop, so we’re dependent on making sure farm workers who are the last people to touch strawberries before consumers do are aware they have a real important step in the food safety process,” O’Donnell said.

The same group of commission representatives is doing the assessment in every region of the state. As of late February, they had not yet visited the Central Valley.

“The (first) assessment helped us inform our food safety guidelines and our education program,” O’Donnell said. “The question now is, do we see any changes and what do we need to improve? We’ll check against our guidelines and set goals for what we feel we need to do next with our food safety program.”

The commission is also working with berry growers in Oregon and Washington to support their efforts in food safety education.

“They want to adapt it to their own situation,” O’Donnell said. “Their needs and production practices are a bit different from our own.”

The commission has been recognized for its work in this field in recent years.

For example, in 2010 it was one of six winners of NSF International’s Food Safety Leadership Awards. Ann Arbor, Mich.-based NSF lauded that initial industry-wide risk assessment and the establishment of one of the earliest commodity-specific safety guidelines.

On its website, the commission recently expanded its food safety section at www.calstrawberry.com/members/fsp.asp.

 


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight