Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Nuts, Dates & Dried Fruit

Hazelnut growers still waiting for FDA guidance

Events earlier this year have Oregon hazelnuts and their growers on hold this fall. Predictions set the beginning of harvest around mid-October in most orchards because of delayed nut development following unusual spring weather.

No one’s predicting how long growers will be waiting for a food safety guidance document from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Representatives from the FDA met via teleconference in May with industry representatives for a nonpublic discussion about what the growers and packers are doing to avoid pathogen contamination.

The meeting followed an E. coli outbreak and March recall by repacker DeFranco & Sons, Los Angeles — it preceded a July FDA warning letter to George Packing Co., Newberg, Ore., the company that supplied the nuts to DeFranco.

Polly Owen, manager of the Oregon Hazelnut Marketing Board, participated in the conference call with the FDA and said afterward that government officials said they would issue a guidance document.

In mid-September Owen said no document had been issued, and there had not been any communication from the government regarding it. She said the board and the 650 growers and 20 packers who work with it had already decided not to wait for it. They have gone ahead with previous plans to increase and ensure food safety practices.

“We are looking to make sure everyone is on the same page this fall,” Owen said Sept. 14. “We all think it is important to make sure the (nuts) are safe and not just appease the FDA.”

Neither Larry George, president of George Packing Co. nor FDA officials could be reached for comment on the status of the July warning letter regarding sanitary conditions at a packing facility.

Grower John Sullivan, Vida, Ore., is former president of the Nut Growers Society of Oregon, Washington and British Columbia, Canada. He said the hazelnut industry has been “intent on building a plan for the future” since 2004.

“This (outbreak) didn’t sneak up on us because we’ve been talking about food safety and how to improve it, but we didn’t expect it to have the problem (with in-shell nuts),” Sullivan said.

The fact that in-shell nuts hadn’t previously been linked to the particular pathogen involved in the outbreak caused it to generate more attention than it might have otherwise, Owen said.

The outbreak and subsequent recall didn’t have much impact on the industry, according to Owen, Sullivan and Paul DeFranco, co-owner of DeFranco & Sons.

“It didn’t have any impact on demand,” DeFranco said Sept. 22.


Comments (2) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Anon    
Report Abuse
Oregon  |  November, 10, 2011 at 04:23 PM

What an incredible misleading and inaccurate title! The events of the 2010 harvest never halted any of the 2011 harvest shipments. In addition, you got Owen's name wrong. It's POLLY Owen.

Coral Beach    
Kansas  |  November, 11, 2011 at 09:39 AM

Anon, I apologize for getting Polly's first name wrong. She was a terrific source and is a great champion for the industry. I appreciate you bringing the error to my attention.

As for shipments being halted, I don't believe the story makes that statement. The original headline was misleading, so I have changed it.

It was not my intent to suggest that the industry had come to a standstill. Rather, the delayed harvest because of late nut development due to weather early in the year was what I was referencing. Polly and John Sullivan and other growers I talked with for other stories in this section all said there were delays with the 2011 harvest because of the weather.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight