Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Opinion

Pursue recall insurance

You get the call every produce company dreads.

It’s the Food and Drug Administration, and it found E. coli on your product. The good news is that no illnesses have been reported.

But you’ve prepared for this.

Your company has a crisis plan in place and traceability, so you start recalling product and informing customers. It’s going to be bad for business, sure, but it’s the right thing to do.

You start dealing with media, trying to protect your brand and company’s reputation and not lose customer and consumer trust.

Then you get another call from FDA.

Oops, our bad, FDA says. It was a false positive. Your product is fine to ship.

What now?

You have to call back customers, but those recalled packages are likely lost. Depending on how efficient your recall was, you’ve lost a lot of money, maybe in the millions.

This scenario wasn’t hypothetical for Taylor Farms in late May. It was real.

And while the company did nothing wrong — in fact, it appears it did everything right — it’s taken a hit to its finances and reputation.

Such circumstances could put a smaller, less-established company out of business.

There seems to be no recourse, no recall insurance. There seems to be nothing in the farm bill or the 2012 version currently in the Senate.

But this is the kind of episode with a respected company that could get it in farm bill negotiations.

Produce companies now have a real-world example to point to when they lobby on this.

Did The Packer get it right? Leave a comment and tell us your opinion.


Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Shipper    
Report Abuse
California  |  June, 04, 2012 at 01:04 PM

We recently tried to buy recall insurance for our small operation. $100k in coverage had a premium of $15K annually. We requested $2 million in coverage and could not find a carrier. For the small producer, which there are many, potential litigation will be devastating.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight