Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Opinion

Technology should match consumer use

Tara Schupner, Copy Editor Any business that neglects the marketing maxim “know your customer” risks doing a painful faceplant onto pavement, as Facebook recently discovered during its IPO debacle.

Some produce marketers, though, have yet to assimilate this.

Understanding produce customers and their behavior is critical to a successful marketing plan, and these days just slapping a QR code onto your apple or orange isn’t going to cut it.

Just as Facebook and its advertisers have learned that social media users habitually ignore paid ad placements, evidence strongly shows that customers also frequently tune out QR codes.

Although a recent study by comScore of European consumers found that product packaging ranks second in QR code scans — at 38% to magazines and newspapers’ 50.9% and fourth-place signage’s 28% — this only covers a small fraction of the total potential market.

Another study conducted by Minneapolis marketing firm Russell Herder found that three in 10 consumers who have seen a QR code before did not know what it was.

In a white paper released last October, Russell Herder also found that only 31% of people who had scanned QR codes more than once felt the information they got was worth their time.

Do the math, and 69% of consumers who scanned QR codes thought it was a waste of their time.

Obviously, produce businesses don’t want consumers to either ignore QR codes altogether or scan them, feel that was a waste of their time, and subsequently ignore QR codes altogether.

Companies that want to effectively use QR codes must ask the tough questions: What can we put on the website that the consumer can’t live without? And when and where is the best time and place to put a QR code before a customer?

What's in a QR code? Russell Herder recommends that “the ideal location for a QR code is one where the user has both enough time to pull out their phone to scan the code and no other means to quickly engage with the messaging.”

A harried mother of three hurrying through the store to pick up ingredients for dinner before her youngest pitches a tantrum is not a user who has time to pull out her phone and scan a QR code.

At the moment she’s rummaging through a pile of avocados, she likely cares more about pricing and quality than about who picked the product.

Produce marketers need to find a way to inform and persuade consumers that they need — not want, but need — to scan a QR code at some point in their purchasing process, and that it will be worth their time.

Ideas along this vein include information on how to choose the best piece of product or a scannable coupon for the product.

But a QR code alone isn’t enough. Consumers need to know what the QR code will lead to in order to decide whether scanning it is a worthwhile expenditure of their time and energy.

This means signage that advertises clearly what this QR code leads to.

And once consumers are at the site and get what they need, they’ll be more likely to return and browse when they have time.

Here’s where you tack on the novelty stuff.

Another idea is that produce marketers could move past this QR code fad and explore other means of advertising that more effectively engage consumers.

This doesn’t mean retail shoppers who are on the move.

It means people who are sitting at home, on their computers, surfing Facebook.

It means people who are sitting at restaurants, playing with the latest marketing innovation to hit foodservice: small, interactive computer screens at their tables.

A recent article in The Wall Street Journal profiled these devices, which are being tested at Chili’s Grill and Bar and Applebee’s, among others. Consumers can use them to order food and play games and watch short video clips while they wait for their meals.

Produce marketers should jump at this potentially more cost-effective opportunity to market to a captive audience. And in family-friendly restaurants like Chili’s and Applebee’s, with health and nutrition-conscious parents, produce has an advantage over other prospective advertisers such as alcohol.

If restaurants understand their customers too, they’ll team up with you to market the connection between your healthful product and their menu items.

tschupner@thepacker.com

What's your take? Leave a comment and tell us your opinion.


Prev 1 2 Next All


Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

John Bailey    
Report Abuse
Salinas Valley, California  |  July, 05, 2012 at 02:31 AM

Well said. Thanks!

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight