Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Opinion

Q&A | Shelley Hearne, Pew Charitable Trusts

The Packer’s National Editor Tom Karst on Oct. 3 chatted with Shelley Hearne, managing director of the Pew Health Group at The Pew Charitable Trusts and a visiting professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Read the entire chat on the Fresh Talk blog.
12:04 p.m. Tom Karst: What is your sense on where the USDA is with comments they received on the proposed update to nutrition standards for school meals? Do you think they can get the final rulemaking done in short order?
12:05 p.m. Shelley Hearne: We are very optimistic. There has been overwhelming support. The devil is in the details — there are always going to be people pushing the edges. 
But I think that once again (we have) the momentum, and the fact that there has been a funding commitment — and in these economic times that is an extraordinary testament to the importance of the commitment to our schools and our kids and to getting nutritious healthy foods on their plates. 
So I think we think that this once again is another step in an alliance of what many see as unusual partners being successful.
12:06 p.m. Karst: In terms of the updated nutrition standards for schools, there is some controversy about limits on starchy vegetables and the financial piece on how this would affect school districts. How do you see those issues playing out, and do you think the USDA can tweak their proposal to accommodate some of those concerns? What do you think is going to happen?
12:07 p.m. Hearne: I’m a simple scientist. At Pew, we are religious about being focused on about the facts we know. What we have been taking a look at with all the work we have been engaged in (is) looking at the work of the Institute of Medicine’s finding. Here is what those scientists thought were the most important standards, fixes, needs, whether it is in nutrition, food safety or antibiotic stewardship. 
We also know that thousands of schools have already been able to implement these types of common sense recommendations with the dollars that they have. On top of that, we have the federal government willing to invest an additional 6 cents per meal. The standards are science-based and the health savings — I think the current proposed guidelines are achievable. 
12:09 p.m. Karst: Do you think updated nutrition standards for school meals can increase fruit and vegetable consumption among children? Will that be a result of what is going on here?
12:10 p.m. Hearne: By offering children the fruits and vegetables they need for a healthy lifestyle, we’re getting more and more data and evidence how to encourage the selection and consumption of those vegetables. Data indicates that those pathways are forming. 
This will come down to how each school and district implement and own the guidelines and what they do, but we’re optimistic that behavior changes can happen once you make good food accessible.

The Packer’s National Editor Tom Karst on Oct. 3 chatted with Shelley Hearne, managing director of the Pew Health Group at The Pew Charitable Trusts and a visiting professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Read the entire chat on the Fresh Talk blog.

12:04 p.m. Tom Karst: What is your sense on where the USDA is with comments they received on the proposed update to nutrition standards for school meals? Do you think they can get the final rulemaking done in short order?

Hearne 12:05 p.m. Shelley Hearne: We are very optimistic. There has been overwhelming support. The devil is in the details — there are always going to be people pushing the edges. 

But I think that once again (we have) the momentum, and the fact that there has been a funding commitment — and in these economic times that is an extraordinary testament to the importance of the commitment to our schools and our kids and to getting nutritious healthy foods on their plates. 

So I think we think that this once again is another step in an alliance of what many see as unusual partners being successful.

12:06 p.m. Karst: In terms of the updated nutrition standards for schools, there is some controversy about limits on starchy vegetables and the financial piece on how this would affect school districts. How do you see those issues playing out, and do you think the USDA can tweak their proposal to accommodate some of those concerns? What do you think is going to happen?

12:07 p.m. Hearne: I’m a simple scientist. At Pew, we are religious about being focused on about the facts we know. What we have been taking a look at with all the work we have been engaged in (is) looking at the work of the Institute of Medicine’s finding. Here is what those scientists thought were the most important standards, fixes, needs, whether it is in nutrition, food safety or antibiotic stewardship. 

We also know that thousands of schools have already been able to implement these types of common sense recommendations with the dollars that they have. On top of that, we have the federal government willing to invest an additional 6 cents per meal. The standards are science-based and the health savings — I think the current proposed guidelines are achievable. 

12:09 p.m. Karst: Do you think updated nutrition standards for school meals can increase fruit and vegetable consumption among children? Will that be a result of what is going on here?

12:10 p.m. Hearne: By offering children the fruits and vegetables they need for a healthy lifestyle, we’re getting more and more data and evidence how to encourage the selection and consumption of those vegetables. Data indicates that those pathways are forming. 

This will come down to how each school and district implement and own the guidelines and what they do, but we’re optimistic that behavior changes can happen once you make good food accessible.


Prev 1 2 Next All


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight