Food safety progress - The Packer

Food safety progress

05/03/2013 01:11:00 PM
The Packer Editorial Board

It’s good to be reminded how much healthier the fresh produce industry’s food safety system is now compared to a decade ago.

Earthbound Farm senior vice president Will Daniels provided that reminder at the Baltimore Food Safety Summit when he talked about what his company learned from the 2006 spinach outbreak and how it changed Earthbound Farm, then called Natural Selection Foods. Story, A1

He said food safety should not be a competitive advantage, and to prove that, Earthbound Farm plans to open its wash line and facilities to competitors.

Daniels also talked about what a mess the 2006 investigation was, from competing government agencies to duplication of documentation to bad legal advice to a focus on short-term costs savings.

Since that tipping point outbreak, private companies, public companies, association groups and government agencies all looked at their procedures and made substantive changes.

Companies are increasingly sharing their technologies. Produce industry leaders have formed groups such as the Center for Produce Safety to encourage food safety innovation. The Food and Drug Administration is listening to business concerns and challenges as it works through the extended comment period of the Food Safety Modernization Act.

Of course there are still problems, as there are still outbreaks and even illnesses, poor food safety handling practices at some companies, bureaucracy, ego battles and companies who insist on marketing on food safety.

But Daniels’ comments are the most recent example of how people can take a problem and turn it into something that can make the produce industry stronger.



Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Dan    
CA.  |  May, 06, 2013 at 10:58 AM

Grocery stores should be next in line for some regulation. The "showers" that many use to keep produce damp and shiny should be banned, running water over something that could be contaminated ( most likely be a shopper) and spreading the contamination to other pieces of produce just does not make sense. If govt agencies are pulling samples for testing off shelves, as one is led to believe, this should stop. Recalls cost many thousands of dollars, customer contamination is very real. Pull the samples before they reach the store level. Trucking to the warehouses and from the warehouses to the stores should also be of concern. Food is almost always grown outdoors, there will always be a risk. But..stopping any further contamination should be addressed. If the growers and handlers must abide by food safety rules, the chain of custody should also be addressed.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight