Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Opinion

Complex solutions for produce wash water

Vicky Boyd, Staff Writer Pathogen-contaminated wash water has been linked to a handful of foodborne illness outbreaks over the years, including last year’s listeria outbreak at a Colorado cantaloupe grower-packer-shipper.

But reducing the risks isn’t as simple as dumping in an appropriate amount of disinfectant and walking away.

Wash water and its interaction with produce, organic matter associated with produce and even other micro-organisms found on produce is a complex subject with no single answer.

This was evident as a handful of researchers presented updates on their projects at the Center for Produce Safety’s third annual Produce Research Symposium June 27 in Davis, Calif.

“The researchers don’t always agree,” said Bob Whitaker, chief science and technology officer with the Produce Marketing Association, Newark, Del., as he reviewed the projects at the PMA’s Gold Circle Breakfast the next morning.

“One size doesn’t fit all.”

Because of potential risks and complexities, Whitaker said PMA will focus on wash water in educational sessions during the next five months.

The subject also is a research priority for the Davis-based Center for Produce Safety, said Bonnie Fernandez-Fenaroli, executive director.

One thing researchers did agree upon was that wash water shouldn’t be viewed as a kill step.

Instead, growers should start with GAPS, or good agricultural practices, in the field to minimize the risk of foodborne pathogens. Similar food-safety steps should be followed throughout the food chain.

“The take-home message is it’s quality in, quality out,” said Keith Warriner, a food science professor at the University of Guelph in Ontario.

“If you get bad quality going in, you get bad quality going out.”

At best, wash water should not be a source of cross-contamination.

As its name implies, wash water is intended to remove dirt and other impurities from produce including tomatoes, peppers, cantaloupe and leafy greens.

If unsafe water is used, it can contaminate everything it contacts.

Even if you start with safe water, cross-contamination may occur should one piece of produce carry pathogens that are washed off.

“Typically 90% of the microbial load is shed. Therefore, we need to come up with means to decrease levels to prevent cross-contamination,” said Elliot Ryser, a food science professor at Michigan State University, East Lansing.

That’s where a disinfectant comes in, frequently some form of chlorine.

But it’s not simply dumping in a jug of chlorine.

Even produce operations that carefully monitor levels of chlorine, pH and other components find it’s a daunting task to keep disinfectants at appropriate levels.

They may sample every hour, but the results only give you a picture of what happened at that moment in time.

It doesn’t show what happened the other 59 minutes.

Chlorine is very sensitive to organic matter, so when you dump in a load of chopped lettuce, for example, the organic matter in the lettuce juice can greatly reduce the disinfectant’s effectiveness.

Whitaker said the industry has made great strides from just 10 years ago, when he witnessed packinghouse workers using swimming pool chlorine and pH paper to test the water.

Although he said most of the larger packers have since installed much more sophisticated systems, some of the smaller packers no doubt still use the old system.

“And if those guys have a problem, we all have a problem,” he said, referring to how a foodborne illness outbreak can taint the entire industry.

Like all the research CPS funds, the wash water projects are designed to yield applicable results in only a couple of years.

Let’s hope it’s sooner, rather than later.

vboyd@vancepublishing.com

What's your take? Leave a comment and tell us your opinion.


Prev 1 2 Next All


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight