Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Opinion

Cornell reinvents wheel with food study

Fred Wilkinson, Food for ThoughtFred Wilkinson, Food for Thought Ah, university food researchers. Sometimes it’s a tough call whether to admire their work or mock their corny, naive efforts.

Maybe both?

Case in point: the Ivy League campus of Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y., where scientists are seeking to answer the question: Does giving vegetables silly names improve child nutrition?

Yup, that’s right. In a bizarre real-world parallel to the old Monty Python skit about the Ministry of Silly Walks, Cornell University boasts a Department of Hokey Produce Names.

OK, that’s not exactly true, but the university’s Food and Brand Lab is testing the hypothesis that goofy names on school lunch menus can get schoolchildren to increase their vegetable consumption.

Cornell researchers are testing the likelihood that students at five “ethnically and economically diverse” schools would eat items dubbed “X-Ray Vision Carrots,” “Power Punch Broccoli,” “Tiny Tasty Tree Tops” and “Silly Dilly Green Beans” over the same foods labeled “Food of the Day.”

According to a Huffington Post report, funny names do translate into kids eating more vegetables.

In one school, 66% of the carrots labeled “X-Ray Vision Carrots” were eaten compared to 32% when they were just “Food of the Day.”

The Cornell study concluded, “These results demonstrate that using attractive names for healthy foods increases kid’s selection and consumption of these foods and that an attractive name intervention is robust, effective and scalable at little or no cost.

This research also confirms that using attractive names to make foods sound more appealing works on individuals across all age levels.”

So nice job, Poindexters.

Your study has “discovered” a couple fundamentals of marketing and branding that are likely taught in Marketing 101 elsewhere on campus.

fwilkinson@thepacker.com

What's your take? Leave a comment and tell us your opinion.


Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

John    
Report Abuse
Floriduh  |  September, 24, 2012 at 07:37 AM

You just referenced a HufPo report. I stopped reading after that. HufPo's newsworthiness is on the same level as Yahoo's. Everything there is devoid of fact and feels like it's written by 12-year-olds.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight