Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Opinion

Fight over GMOs moves north

Vicky Boyd, Staff WriterVicky Boyd, Staff Writer Despite a defeat by California voters in November, proponents of labeling foods that contain genetically modified organisms — or GMOs — have not given up.

They’re taking their fight to legislators in Washington state as well as to Connecticut and Vermont this year and possibly to Oregon in 2014.

If you can believe website postings, GMO labeling proponents also plan to petition the Food and Drug Administration for similar requirements.

Proposition 37, dubbed the California Right to Know measure, would have required most genetically modified crops and foods that contained GMOs to be labeled as such.

It was the brainchild of Pamm Larry, a grandmother, former farmer and midwife from Chico, Calif., who launched the effort in January 2011.

Proponents said labeling would provide more information to shoppers, who could then decide whether to purchase the products.

Opponents countered that GMOs were deemed safe by the Food and Drug Administration and U.S. Department of Agriculture, and no further labeling was needed.

Money poured into the fight, with opponents spending more than $46 million compared to proponents’ $9 million. The measure was defeated 53% to 47%.

But supporters said they were heartened by the more than 4 million people who voted for labeling, and they’ve moved the battle up the road to Washington.

In California, supporters went directly to the electorate and qualified the measure for the November 2012 general election ballot by collecting enough valid signatures.

Washington state campaign

In Washington, the University Place-based Label It Wa group is going the legislative initiative route.

Chris McManus, owner of a small Tacoma, Wash., advertising firm, is leading the charge. Among the early financial backers is Seattle-based PCC Natural Markets, a member-owned cooperative that contributed $100,000 toward signature gathering.

Supporters had to collect 241,153 valid signatures by Jan. 4 to bring the measure before the legislature.

Lawmakers can adopt, reject or modify the proposal. If they reject the measure, it will be placed on the November general election ballot — which is typically the path a Washington state initiative follows.

If lawmakers modify the measure, both the original and modified versions are put on the ballot.

Initiative supporters submitted about 350,000 signatures to the Secretary of State’s Elections Division on Jan. 3, according to the secretary’s office.

The office is expected to announce before month’s end whether the initiative has enough valid signatures to be certified.

According to the Initiative-522 proposal, all raw foods labeled for retail sale would have to carry the words “genetically engineered” conspicuously printed on the front package or be deemed misbranded. The rules would become effective July 1, 2015.

In the case of bulk produce, the label would have to appear on the retail shelf or bin where the items are displayed.

Processed foods that contained GMOs would have to carry front labeling stating “may be partially produced with genetic engineering,” according to the proposal.

Let the games begin.

vboyd@thepacker.com

What's your take? Leave a comment and tell us your opinion.


Prev 1 2 Next All


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight