Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Opinion

Looking ahead on GMO labeling

Mike Hornick, Staff Writer An ABC News poll shows 93% of Americans want labels on genetically modified foods, but an attempt to make them law in California drew just 47% of the vote.

Proposition 37 went down in flames in the Nov. 6 election.

I guess we’re bucking the trend here in the Golden State. Or maybe it was just asking too much of the measure’s backers to cobble together a winning majority out of 93% support.

The ballot initiative’s failure was blamed variously on poor wording, loopholes, or $45 million in opposition donations, mostly from the packaged and canned foods industry.

Seed companies Bayer CropScience and Syngenta grabbed a piece of that action, about $2 million each. Monsanto was the biggest donor at more than $8 million, nearly matching the whole war chest backing Proposition 37.

Organic Consumers Fund was the top donor on the yes side with about $1.3 million. Endorsements from organic growers included Lundberg Family Farms and Stonyfield Farm.

The implication that organics or anyone stood to profit from GMO labels — however much less than Monsanto profits from their absence — cost credibility for 37.

California is liberal, but jaded by the tug of war between competing interests in the initiative process.

Support was framed in terms of a right to know, but in its fine print the campaign also wanted to pin a scarlet letter on supposed sinners.

Support tactics

One argument in the state’s official ballot materials claimed 37 would help protect your family’s health.

The California Council of Churches was among the groups favoring 37. Churches play a smaller role in California life than they once did, or still do elsewhere.

But there are as many puritans here as ever, people consumed by thoughts of virtue and vice if not matters of faith.

They were a natural constituency for the measure. But even on friendly turf, you’ve still got to make the sale.

Somebody will make it. If 93% want GMO labeling, it will happen eventually. Then it’ll be up to the industry to turn a scarlet letter into a badge of honor, if it can.

Get those marketing departments warmed up in the bullpen.

In other states

The next step for advocacy groups like Just Label It is in the state of Washington, where signatures are being gathered for a 2013 ballot initiative.

Federal farm bill lobbying is also on tap.

mhornick@thepacker.com

What's your take? Leave a comment and tell us your opinion.


Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Homer    
Report Abuse
Fresno  |  November, 28, 2012 at 05:50 PM

You call 47% of the vote on first time ballet going down in flames? Opponents outspend
(with lies) tens of millions to defeat this. It will get back on next ballot and it will pass.
The bill may not have been written perfectly (rarely is the case with politics) but
consumers have the right to know. This ain't China Mike.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight