Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Opinion

Perceived savings moves more product

Denise Donohue, Donohue Associates My girlfriend, Marsha, called me one night, practically giddy.

“I’ve got a great idea about how you should be promoting fruit,” she said.

In need of new ideas, I urged her on. She’s a lawyer, so of course she doesn’t like her job that much, and sometimes she likes to do mine.

Like I said, I need the ideas.

“I really like it when they price oranges by the each,” she said.

“You know, three for $2 or $1 each. I know what I’m getting for the money, and I always buy more than I planned since it seems like such a bargain.”

Marsha makes six figures and shops regularly for children. She’s a target consumer, and with that income she should be price insensitive. She mostly is.

But Marsha wants to feel good, like maybe she’s snagged a bargain.

For her and most other shoppers, price tops the list of considerations. In a November 2011 survey by Supermarket News, respondents said the No. 1 improvement their primary grocery store could make was to lower prices.

News bulletin: Since grocery stores operate on razor-thin margins, they won’t be dropping prices anytime soon.

But what if the issue was perceived price? In other words, how the fruit was priced rather than the actual price.

Interestingly, I’m reading “All the Money in the World: What the Happiest People Know About Getting and Spending.” Author Laura Vanderkam makes the case that upping our incomes is more effective than scrimping, although scrimping is far more common.

She writes that “because we shop at the grocery store more often than other places, that’s where we think we should put this thrift into practice.”

But cutting out life’s little food pleasures barely moves the needle on our personal budgets.

As the book and every grocer knows, the reality is that shoppers — even six-figure earners like Marsha — are at least somewhat attuned to perceived bargains.

Although our goal is to not discount the produce, can we give the perception of a bargain?

Here are three suggestions for perceived bargains that could actually improve your bottom line.

Idea No. 1. Is pricing by the “each”? Marsha doesn’t know the cost of an apple. She can read signs that give the price per pound and the price per sack.

“Price per pound is ambiguous,” she said. “I just want to know when I pick them up how many I can get for the money. If I know I can get three oranges for $2, I’m just as likely to buy six because it’s such a bargain.”

Is it really? Let’s do the math.

I weighed out 2 pounds of red delicious apples at the store, which was four apples costing $3.38.

To Marsha’s point, if a sign offered by-the-each pricing — say 2 apples for $2 — she thinks she’d buy twice as many, or four apples for $4.

The store could pocket the extra 61 cents, or give her 5 apples for $4 and move extra volume — or bring in a slightly smaller size and do both.

Shoppers aren’t walking scales. We often go with our perceptions instead of the math.

I’m not suggesting produce be promoted this way all the time. But on a rotating basis throughout the department, it could be a good volume builder.

Idea No. 2. In the recent recession I’ve heard grocers say that while overall produce dollars stayed the same, the “number of rings” declined.

This is a possible indication the shopper is being more cautious, buying less at a time.

If so, can we package smaller-sized bags or bundles? She may have to shop more frequently, but it appears she prefers to part with less of her money at once.

Besides, every time I go to the store for one item, somehow $39 leaks out of my wallet. It happens to my husband too. Smaller packages might be a bring-‘em-back strategy.

Idea No. 3. Here’s another packaging thought: Sell slightly smaller produce in a custom package, maybe even with a higher pricepoint.

As an example, I found Stemilt’s snazzy 3-pound anjou Lil Snappers package at $3.29 ($1.10/pound) on sale. The Snapper anjous appear a third smaller than Stemilt’s fancy anjous ($1.29/pound) sold right next to them.

The Snapper pears were too small for regular bulk. They may have been destined for processing where they sell for cents per pound. But repositioning these pears as a kid item, with a cute bag and the Snappers name — aaah, better life and profits through packaging.

Any one of these ideas gives Marsha a perceived bargain price and doesn’t require her to be a human scale.

Denise Donohue is founder of Donohue Associates, DeWitt, Mich., a marketing and public relations firm specializing in agriculture. Before that, she was director of the Michigan Apple Committee, Lansing.

What's your take? Leave a comment and tell us your opinion.


Prev 1 2 Next All


Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Kristine Ranger    
Report Abuse
DeWitt  |  July, 25, 2012 at 04:22 PM

I enjoyed your humor (and your friends enthusiasm) in this article, but I'm either a thrifty shopper or keenly aware of marketing tactics because I always do the math to find the best deal. Or maybe I just like math!! Actually, I think that parents would be doing their children a favor by teaching them how to spot these "peceived bargains" and encouraging them to do the comparisons. I know I did. But then, I taught my children to buy local and cook real food too!!

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight