From the story:
“The two largest school districts in California — Los Angeles Unified and San Diego — have banished meat from their elementary school lunch menus for one day each week, part of a growing trend nationwide among school districts to adopt ‘Meatless Mondays.’”
While the produce industry likely wants to stay away from the negative terminology of “Meatless Monday,” the Produce for Better Health Foundation should embrace the concept that consumers can meet all of their dietary needs from fruits and vegetables for at least one day of the week.
Given the deficit in actual consumption levels of fresh produce compared with recommended levels, the advice is well-grounded in nutritional common sense.
The industry should pick a day of the week and start to hammer the message of “all produce, around the clock” for that day.
Taking the concept of limiting (or encouraging) the intake of certain foods for a certain day of the week, there is new momentum afoot to put a blanket ban on the purchase of junk food with food stamp benefits.
The Center for Science in the Public Interest said in a recent news release that state and local governments should be able to test pilot programs designed to promote healthier food and beverage purchases by participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
CSPI said 54 national and local health groups, as well as 19 prominent physicians and nutrition experts, called on Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack to allow such pilot programs, which might include curbs on purchases of soda and other sugary drinks or unhealthy foods.
The public health group noted the U.S. Department of Agriculture turned down a 2004 request from the state of Minnesota and a 2011 request from New York City to conduct pilot programs that would have excluded sugary drinks from SNAP.
Some may sigh and exclaim, “When will the nanny state end?”
The nanny state should end as soon as the government stops spending $78 billion per year on food stamp benefits for nearly 50 million people. Until then, the public health interest of taxpayers trumps notions of “anything goes.”
Given both competitive and public health criteria, produce industry advocates like the United Fresh Produce Association and the Produce Marketing Association should actively support the ability for states to restrict the purchase of sugared soda pop (and perhaps other junk food) with food stamp benefits.
What's your take? Leave a comment and tell us your opinion.