Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Opinion

Q&A | Kam Quarles, McDermott Will & Emery

National Editor Tom Karst recently chatted with Kam Quarles, director of legislative affairs for the Washington, D.C.-based McDermott Will & Emery law firm. Quarles was formerly vice president of government relations and legislative affairs for the Washington, D.C.-based United Fresh Produce Association.

3:05 p.m. Tom Karst: We hear a lot that farm issues are bipartisan, but now it seems they are perhaps less so. Is that something that you see, the increasing tension along party lines for ag issues? What is your sense on how the debate on farm policy is shaping up this year?

Quarles 3:06 p.m. Kam Quarles: I think the thing that is challenging for agriculture that is new — and it has actually been a continuing trend — is the dwindling number of congressional districts, House districts, that have production agriculture in them.

As the U.S. urbanizes and you tend to have migration toward the big city centers and large suburban areas, it is drawing people away from agricultural districts. It is putting a big burden on those members who have production in their districts as well as industry to explain to people that their food isn’t grown in the grocery store, it is actually produced somewhere — trying to educate them about the processes involved in bringing that abundant supply of food to the market place.

You have just a handful of votes on either side that could sway who is in control of the Senate or the House. Those tiny margins keep people looking very squarely at the next election. It has just created a lot of volatility.

That overlays really everything that is done back here. To some degree that impacts agriculture, but I still like to believe we really need to be bipartisan in nature if we are going to accomplish our goals.

3:08 p.m. Karst: Speaking of a big goal, the farm bill process is moving. Do you think enough can get done to move it through Congress and get it passed this year?

3:08 p.m. Quarles: I think there is certainly time to do it. The question is whether all the pieces can be put together before the Sept. 30 expiration.

We are likely heading toward one of these volatile election cycles and it is really going to depend on Congress’ appetite for being able to take on big policy objectives as you have an election marching closer and closer. It is tough to tell right now. I think the committees are very sincere in trying to put all the pieces together to give themselves the best opportunity to have a farm bill before expiration, but there is probably a lot of rough road between here and there.

3:09 p.m. Karst: You have also been witness and participant in the Specialty Crop Farm Bill Alliance and seen how the industry has worked together over the past couple of farm bills. Do you think it is significant accomplishment, what has been done with this alliance?

3:10 p.m. Quarles: I think the Specialty Crop Farm Bill Alliance is one of the most significant and positive developments for the industry over the last decade. The ability to come together with one unified voice and establish priorities for Congress and the administration in U.S. farm policy; it is very helpful for us as an industry to go through that process and it is also very helpful for the people who are writing these laws.


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight