Instead of buckling down and tackling updated school meal standards like eighth-graders sweating over algebra equations, some members of the association and its leadership are whining and making excuses.
“It’s too hard,” they seem to say. “Can we turn in the assignment next year — or never?”
The costs associated with the serving requirement of fruits and vegetables have been astronomical, they protest, forcing kids to take fruits and vegetables that wind up in the dumpster.
“We’re not making healthy students, we’re making healthy trash cans,” one SNA member said in a late May teleconference.
The SNA’s flip-flop on school nutrition standards is getting attention, with The New York Times headlining July 1 coverage of the SNA with the headline “Nutrition Group Lobbies Against Healthier School Meals It Sought, Citing Cost”.
The SNA supported updated nutrition standards when the Obama administration in 2012 announced changes to require more fruits and vegetables and less sugar and salt in government-subsidized school meals. Now the group has done a 180 and is leading the charge to opt out, ironically, “of the very rules it helped to create,” the Times story reports.
The piece even quotes a former agriculture department official who said that SNA has “sold their souls to the devil,” the quintessential slapdown sum-up quote.
As if to validate that judgment, 19 former presidents of the School Nutrition Association are on record as being opposed to waivers the SNA now wants.
Who are the devil and his legions? The usual suspects, I suppose — mostly big-money food companies that cover much of the School Nutrition Association’s budget and their lobbyists who claim pizza sauce is a vegetable — and, who knows, perhaps the cheese curd coalition.
The Packer’s coverage of this issue, “School lunch battle expected to be long haul,” reveals the battle over nutrition standards for school lunches is expected to last through 2015.