Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Opinion

Turning food safety knowledge into action

Bob Whitaker, Produce Marketing Association Effective implementation and regulation of food safety programs must be founded in science-based research.

Turning that knowledge into action is what the Center for Produce Safety in Davis, Calif., is all about.

A record 325 people recently gathered at CPS for the third annual Produce Research Symposium.

This wasn’t a scientific meeting — instead, researchers behind 16 recent CPS-funded studies each had 10 minutes to present findings.

After each presentation, panel discussions among a mix of academics, government officials and industry members from across the supply chain translated the results and how to move forward.

As Mary Ellen Burris, senior vice president of consumer affairs for Wegmans Food Markets, Rochester, N.Y., said, “CPS is like speed dating for food safety. It streamlines the research needed for finding root causes or better metrics for issues in produce food safety and leads to action taken on the research.”

In the short time since its inception in 2007, CPS has committed more than $10.6 million to fund 69 projects at 26 institutions in 17 states and three countries.

Because food safety is a top priority for Produce Marketing Association members, PMA’s contributions alone to CPS total more than $3 million since its creation. PMA also dedicates half of my time to CPS as chairman of its technical committee, which directs all CPS research activities.

At the most recent symposium we presented research findings in four areas:

 

  • good agricultural practices buffer zones and animal vectors;
  • GAP irrigation water quality;
  • GAP inputs, cultivation and harvest; and
  • wash water and process control.

 

Finding solutions to food safety challenges demands a supply chainwide discussion based on an informed understanding of not only the food safety practices for where you’re at in the supply chain, but also those practices that come before and after you.

As the recent symposium again demonstrated, all stakeholders working together to identify research needs, conduct research and translate those findings into implementable solutions makes huge gains in produce safety.

One of the exciting things I see growing each year at this symposium is the outreach between industry and the research community. Links are increasingly created among scientists, harvesters, growers, processors, shippers and the whole supply chain.

Growers from the Central Valley or Massachusetts, for example, get talking with leading research authorities about their situation. Next thing you know, there’s an exchange of information or an agreement to work together — it’s produce safety in action.

That type of collaboration is valuable on many levels, but perhaps most importantly because it helps everyone leverage resources efficiently.

With the whole supply chain informed and committed, a wider range of variables can be considered, data collected, and risk assessments and management practices can be conducted quantitatively.

This permits limited resources to be concentrated where they are most needed.

After all, when it comes to food safety, everything’s a priority.

If you’re an industry member, this makes it hard to identify control points and analyze management strategies. If you’re a researcher, this makes it hard to identify research needs.

Without quantitative risk assessment, everyone’s left with everything as a No. 1 priority.

When everything’s a No. 1 priority, nothing gets done.

Fourteen-year-old Dana Dziadul, who contracted Salmonella Poona from eating contaminated cantaloupe as a 3-year-old and still suffers side effects, reminded symposium attendees that chasing our tails is not acceptable.

Scientific data must be our guide to safeguarding the supply of fresh produce.

Never lose sight that food safety is about people. When our systems don’t work, people get sick.

CPS was founded by PMA, Taylor Farms, and other industry, government and university leaders, to prevent people from getting sick by identifying knowledge gaps in creating and implementing food safety initiatives and developing data to fill those gaps.

Put CPS’s findings to work for your customers — and trust me, you don’t need a Ph.D.

In plain language, you’ll find an extensive research database and expert resources. In the coming weeks, you’ll also find more information about the recent symposium’s research findings from PMA, including an e-learning course.

While developing food safety plans is personal because everyone has different systems, putting science-based data to work for continuous improvement in produce safety is everybody’s business.

Bob Whitaker is chief science & technology officer for the Produce Marketing Association, Newark, Del.

What's your take? Leave a comment and tell us your opinion.


Prev 1 2 Next All


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight