Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Fresh Talk Blog

To COOL or not to COOL: Should origin labeling be repealed?

It is a given that retailers would love to repeal the country or origin labeling law, and the recent World Trade Organization dispute panel finding against the law appears to create an opening to shed the law with the official sanction of the world trade body. Find The Packer's coverage of the story here.

Of course it won't be that easy. The office of the U.S. Trade Representative issued a statement that didn't appear to signal that the Administration would walk away from the law. From the USTR:

“We are pleased that the panel affirmed the right of the United States to require country of origin labeling for meat products,”  said Andrea Mead, Press Secretary for the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. “Although the panel disagreed with the specifics of how the United States designed those requirements, we remain committed to providing consumers with accurate and relevant information with respect to the origin of meat products that they buy at the retail level. In that regard we are considering all options, including appealing the panel’s decision.”

Despite high rates of compliance with the law,FMI said the country of origin law needs to be repealed or rewritten.

I hope the retail industry doesn't advocate once again for a "voluntary" country of origin labeling scheme. That won't get the job done.  The more honest approach would be a push for outright repeal.

I'm curious what readers think. I posed the question to the Fresh Produce Industry Discussion Group: 

Should the U.S. country of origin labeling law be scrapped or revised?

So far, mixed feelings:

John writes:


Are we serious about saving tax dollars and reducing the size of government? Repeal COOL. Don't spend a dime on a phone call to Geneva to defend it. We now have trace back and QR codes, right? Unlike when COOL was implemented a few years ago, a consumer who wants to know can point his Android at a QR code and know the latitude, longitude and atlitude of the farm,ranch or fishery that produced the product. .

But Kaycie responds:

Working in produce, I have to say the law is challenging in some aspects, however, there are many farms/packers/shippers that still don't even label items (or labels don't stay on) - I would say only relying on a QR code to provide all information for consumers is not realistic - in addition, many of our organic buyers don't want ANYthing stuck on their produce - for them,  COOL signage is the best way to help them identify source

TK: What do you think? Should COOL be scrapped or tweaked?

Join the LinkedIn Fresh Produce Industry Discussion Group. Check out the stats from LinkedIn on the growth of the group. Facebook link here.

Bookmark the Fresh Talk home page.

Follow me on twitter @tckarst.


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight