Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Fresh Talk Blog

DRC answers: Will there be a PACA trust in Canada?

National Editor Tom Karst This "Frequently Asked Questions" release is from the Dispute Resolution Corporation in Canada about recent talks to bring risk mitigation tools for produce sellers. Here it is, as I received it.


From DRC:

As a result of increased interest in the Harper/Obama Regulatory Cooperation Council’s (RCC) initiative on financial risk mitigation, DRC (Ottawa, Canada) answered a few commonly asked questions to help its members understand its positive implications for both Americans and Canadians in the supply chain.

Question: What is the goal of the Regulatory Cooperation Council’s (RCC) working group on Financial Security for Produce Sellers?

· Answer: In nearly every way, its goal is the same as the one pursued by the tri-national founders of the DRC two decades ago: a North American approach that would provide tools for sellers of produce in order to manage slow pay and no pay accounts. At that time, Article 707 of NAFTA provided the forum for change, the RCC is the forum for today. The DRC provides those tools for sellers of produce when the buyer is solvent and able to pay. What remains to finish the job is a tool that sellers can utilize when the buyer is insolvent and unable to pay. That tool is the stated goal of the RCC.

Question: It sounds like you are talking about something like the PACA Trust available to sellers in the US. Will there be a PACA trust in Canada?

· Answer: Wow, you got right to it and the answer is not an easy one. There are significant differences in the Constitutions of the US and Canada which makes implementing a copy of the PACA Trust model challenging in Canada. We can say that Industry and Government are engaged and agree that the produce industry needs a tool that matches its unique credit and marketing needs. Industry has made it clear that the Canadian tool needs to provide comparable benefits to sellers in Canada that are available to those sellers in the US (and accessible by Canadians). Frankly, it is embarrassing that the US treats Canadian sellers better than Canada does in this regard.

Question: Is the RCC only about trade between the US and Canada?

· Answer: I see your email has a “.ca”, so I will assume you are asking from a Canadian perspective. All 29 RCC initiatives are to address regulatory/trade challenges between the US and Canadian governments. However, the produce related initiative is geared mainly towards providing Canadian producers and sellers access to financial risk mitigation tools not currently available, given the limitations of the current Canadian legislative and regulatory framework. The DRC along with the CHC and CPMA are supporting solutions based on Canadians being able to access two basic tools:

Tool 1 The creation of a single licensing/arbitration system for dealers of fresh produce in Canada, thus creating the basis for an orderly system that will align Canada’s trading practices with those of the U.S.

Tool 2 The creation of a program that provides financial protection for produce sellers in the Canadian marketplace in the case of the buyer going out of business or defaulting on payments.

DRC is urging anyone unfamiliar with this initiative who would like to learn more to please contact their office for additional information.

 

Fruit and Vegetable Dispute Resolution Corporation

Phone:613-234-0982

Fax: 613-234-8036

Email: info@fvdrc.com

 


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight