Keeping it classy: Should booth babes be banned?

11/19/2012 12:30:00 PM
Tom Karst

National Editor Tom Karst Should produce expos ban "booth babes," and by doing so set a reasonable expectation for  professionalism implied in the event?

The topic is making its rounds in the blogosphere, with the Pundit weighing in on the subject recently. Read the piece for yourself, but I get the overall sense that Jim Prevor is in favor of freedom of expression, whether that be Chippendales or Daisy Duke wannabes.

He writes:

"But what about women who are really good at being flirtatious or at just looking good — is it right for one sister to dismiss the talents and abilities of another? Indeed, is it right for women with a whole different set of skills to try to get the rules of the game changed so those other sisters just can’t compete?"

I write the following thoughts with the reminder that they are wholly my own, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Packer, etc.

But when I read what the Pundit wrote, I've got to say... Jim, are you serious? I hope you had a trusted colleague read your copy before you wrote this, because even I'm offended by it.

How does taking exception to the sexist objectification of women via short-term hires at trade shows translate to "trying to get the rules of the game changed so those other sisters just can't compete"?  Do you really want  to accuse the most accomplished women in our industry of simple jealousy?

The fact that some produce professionals are offended that a few companies cast scantily clad women as eye candy to help draw attention to their booth should not be a surprise.

This is the 21st century, after all.

With competing produce shows touting multiple events exalting the professional role of women in the industry, the dissonance between that preaching and the occasional offender is jarring.

True, it is not a huge problem in the U.S.  I've been to some produce trade shows in Latin America and Europe, and some of those shows are much more blatant about their use of minimally clad women as traffic stoppers.

While some thoughtful folks may say that the free market will decide an issue like this over time (they are probably right), there is nothing wrong with showing a little leadership.

And banning "booth babes" is far from unprecedented. This story notes that the 50,000 attendee Eurogamer Expo decided to put in place a ban on "booth babes" for next year's show, following the lead of a couple of other expos in that same industry. Perhaps prompting the action, one offending company put QR codes for their games on the backside of booth babe hot pants.


Prev 1 2 Next All


Comments (5) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Ward Thomas    
McAllen  |  November, 21, 2012 at 02:13 PM

Do you have to sign up with that annoying LinkedIn to vote in this?

Tom K    
Lenexa  |  November, 23, 2012 at 07:53 PM

Yes, for this particular poll. But comments are also accepted, Ward. I know you are well spoken on this issue. Tom K

Deidre Smyrnos    
NH  |  November, 27, 2012 at 07:20 AM

Thank you Tom. I look forward to seeing a response on this from PMA. FMI weighed in on this topic yesterday in Jim Prevor's 11/26 "Perishable Pundit" column.

Deidre Smyrnos    
NH  |  November, 27, 2012 at 09:28 AM

Correction - it was United Fresh Produce Assoc. (not FMI) who weighed in on this topic in the 11/26 edition of the "Perishable Pundit."

Tom K    
Lenexa  |  November, 27, 2012 at 10:28 AM

Yes, I just sent a quick email to United and PMA about this topic, asking for language they give their exhibitors... Tom K

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight