Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Fresh Talk Blog

Keeping it classy: Should booth babes be banned?

National Editor Tom Karst Should produce expos ban "booth babes," and by doing so set a reasonable expectation for  professionalism implied in the event?

The topic is making its rounds in the blogosphere, with the Pundit weighing in on the subject recently. Read the piece for yourself, but I get the overall sense that Jim Prevor is in favor of freedom of expression, whether that be Chippendales or Daisy Duke wannabes.

He writes:

"But what about women who are really good at being flirtatious or at just looking good — is it right for one sister to dismiss the talents and abilities of another? Indeed, is it right for women with a whole different set of skills to try to get the rules of the game changed so those other sisters just can’t compete?"

I write the following thoughts with the reminder that they are wholly my own, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Packer, etc.

But when I read what the Pundit wrote, I've got to say... Jim, are you serious? I hope you had a trusted colleague read your copy before you wrote this, because even I'm offended by it.

How does taking exception to the sexist objectification of women via short-term hires at trade shows translate to "trying to get the rules of the game changed so those other sisters just can't compete"?  Do you really want  to accuse the most accomplished women in our industry of simple jealousy?

The fact that some produce professionals are offended that a few companies cast scantily clad women as eye candy to help draw attention to their booth should not be a surprise.

This is the 21st century, after all.

With competing produce shows touting multiple events exalting the professional role of women in the industry, the dissonance between that preaching and the occasional offender is jarring.

True, it is not a huge problem in the U.S.  I've been to some produce trade shows in Latin America and Europe, and some of those shows are much more blatant about their use of minimally clad women as traffic stoppers.

While some thoughtful folks may say that the free market will decide an issue like this over time (they are probably right), there is nothing wrong with showing a little leadership.

And banning "booth babes" is far from unprecedented. This story notes that the 50,000 attendee Eurogamer Expo decided to put in place a ban on "booth babes" for next year's show, following the lead of a couple of other expos in that same industry. Perhaps prompting the action, one offending company put QR codes for their games on the backside of booth babe hot pants.

Eurogamer director Rupert Loman talked about the ban here.

"One of the things we also decided was that we didn’t want booth babes at the show.

Of course, exhibitors need to bring staff to the show, but they should be interesting, cool and exciting (Master Chief was /amazing/!) and knowledgeable (developers and publisher staff) rather than pretty girls in revealing outfits just for the sake of it. We want the show to be friendly, and all 50,000 attendees to feel comfortable.


At this year’s show three companies showed up with booth babes. Two in particular we thought were dressed inappropriately. As a short term measure we told them to move into the 18+ zone, and we asked some of them to put on leggings as well.


Although it was only a small number of booth babes, our regret is that we didn’t go further on the first day and just say “this isn’t right” and ask them to change their clothes - or not attend. Instead, with the huge pressures of putting on such a large show and everything that comes with it, we let it go. And that’s what has prompted this debate – and we’re sorry it happened.


For future shows we will be issuing formal guidelines: Booth babes are Not OK.
"

I agree with Loman. I've created a poll on the issue.  What do you think?

Should PMA (and other produce shows) ban scantily clad "booth babes" from staffing expo booths? Why or why not?


Prev 1 2 Next All


Comments (5) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Ward Thomas    
Report Abuse
McAllen  |  November, 21, 2012 at 02:13 PM

Do you have to sign up with that annoying LinkedIn to vote in this?

Tom K    
Lenexa  |  November, 23, 2012 at 07:53 PM

Yes, for this particular poll. But comments are also accepted, Ward. I know you are well spoken on this issue.

Tom K

Deidre Smyrnos    
Report Abuse
NH  |  November, 27, 2012 at 07:20 AM

Thank you Tom. I look forward to seeing a response on this from PMA. FMI weighed in on this topic yesterday in Jim Prevor's 11/26 "Perishable Pundit" column.

Deidre Smyrnos    
Report Abuse
NH  |  November, 27, 2012 at 09:28 AM

Correction - it was United Fresh Produce Assoc. (not FMI) who weighed in on this topic in the 11/26 edition of the "Perishable Pundit."

Tom K    
Report Abuse
Lenexa  |  November, 27, 2012 at 10:28 AM

Yes, I just sent a quick email to United and PMA about this topic, asking for language they give their exhibitors...

Tom K

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight