EWG concern for specialty crop block grant progam contrived

10/21/2012 07:29:00 AM
Tom Karst

National Editor Tom Karst The Environmental Working Group wants the Specialty Crop Block Grant Program to straighten up and fly right.

At first blush, it may be difficult to ascertain why the EWG would publish a 41-page document  critiquing the finer points of the SCBGP. But the political agenda isn’t hard to uncover when you think about the connection between the block grant program and the Alliance for Food and Farming.

The alliance has been a bur in the saddle of the EWG for several year now, and the EWG has taken offense that any group – much less any group getting federal funding - would impinge its motives in publishing it infamous “Dirty Dozen” list of pesticide-laden produce.

That’s the real agenda of this report, though the point is buried in the group’s new release.

From the EWG:

OAKLAND, Calif. – An important farm bill program that provides valuable support for California’s growers and consumers of healthy fruits, vegetables and nuts would deliver greater all-around benefits if state officials address shortcomings in the process of awarding the federally-funded grants, an analysis by the Environmental Working Group shows.

The Specialty Crop Block Grant (SCBG) program, one of state’s most important sources of federal funding to expand and promote this $19 billion sector of California agriculture, delivers good value overall, EWG’s analysis found, but it falls short of its potential because grant awards don’t always target projects with the broadest payoff and sometimes don’t align with the state’s top policy priorities.

For example, more than half of the program’s funding is dedicated to research, leaving much less available to expand local and regional markets for growers or to increase access to and consumption of safe and healthy food. Both are key priorities for the state and generate immediate economic and public health benefits. The number of projects funded in these areas nearly doubled in 2011 under California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) Secretary Karen Ross, but EWG concluded that targeting more funding to developing local and regional food markets would deliver even higher returns to growers while boosting public access to healthy food.

“In an era of tight budgets, it is critical that we get this right,” said Kari Hamerschlag, EWG’s senior food policy expert and author of the report. “Spending more money on projects that can deliver direct economic benefits to growers, while improving the health of Californians, is a great way to achieve two important goals at the same time.”


Prev 1 2 Next All


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight