Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Fresh Talk Blog

Give Mitt the lemonade stand

National Editor Tom Karst In a telling truth about his political troubles, President Obama’s most memorable quote is that “you didn’t build that.”

More precisely, President Obama said this (in part) in speech on July 13 this year:

“If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business—you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.”

From the perspective of the produce industry, I’m sure there are many Republican-minded individuals who take great offence at the notion that “If you’ve got a business - you didn’t build that” in reference to the family farm or multi-generation wholesale produce company that was built on the blood, sweat and tears from 12-hour and 16-hour days.

President Obama would speak with so much more authority to members of industry if they could recognize in him a thread of the same kind of life they have experienced, the toil of a small business owner made good. Obama can’t pull that off. With his laid back chill and cool persona, we doubt if he has cared enough about money to run a successful lemonade stand.

At the same time, the more moderate among us may see truth in President Obama’s observations about teachers, roads and bridges. Yes, if not for the help of others we would never be where we are today.

Looking ahead, the fresh produce industry may be faced with the fact that whatever little help the government has given in the past is no guarantee of future support. The seriousness of the budget deficit may call into question many programs that have been given bi-partisan support in the past.

For example, many Republicans and Democrats have long supported food stamps, or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. In March, 46.4 million Americans were receiving food stamp benefits, with an annual cost to the federal budget of more than $86 billion.

Republicans on the Senate Budget Committee have estimated that the total number of food stamp recipients has grown 65% since the end of 2008, while the total number of employed people has fallen 0.7%. Those trends can’t continue forever.

Food stamps are well supported by the food industry as well, with the USDA estimating that 85% of food stamps were spent at supermarkets in 2010. From some discount chains like Save-A-Lot, food stamps account for as much as 40% of sales. Retailers support food stamps in a big way.

But while there will always be those advocates for the hungry who say that federal and state governments should do more to make sure needy families receive food they need, there are more critics than ever questioning the program.

Yale’s Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity estimates that food stamps are used to purchase of up $2.1 billion a year in sugar-sweetened beverages by SNAP participants. That can’t be good for America, can it?

There are other critics who have attacked fruit and vegetable programs and nutrition education.

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., published what he called “Wastebook” http://1.usa.gov/QqpGR7 in October this year, 202-page compilation of programs he considers wasteful.

From the report, Coburn questions a fruit and vegetable linked program sponsored by the Department of Health and Human Services that spent $97,000 on the “MyPlate Fruits and Veggies Video Challenge,” a contest for schools to create 30-second videos to support healthy eating.

“As adorable or fun as some of the videos may be, such words are falling on ears that have heard messages about fruits and veggies for years,” he writes.

Among the handful of industry-related projects he skewers in “Wastebook,” he also attacks the Healthy Food Financing Initiative (HFFI) – a multimillion dollar program intended to expand access to healthy foods and fresh produce in some low-income communities.

It is hard to know how much the world will change in the next few months. If Mitt Romney wins the presidency, there will be less funding for industry-supported initiatives in the farm bill, including food stamps, specialty crop block grants and other programs.

On his website, Romney’s campaign says:

“As president, Mitt Romney will ask a simple question about every federal program: is it so important, so critical, that it is worth borrowing money from China to pay for it?”

Now that you put it that way, there are not many programs that pass muster. Austerity and bare-bone spending is not an answer by itself, true.

But it may be an unavoidable reality given our country’s crushing debt. Americans who want change can only hope Romney can create a new era of prosperity by delivering policies that allow Americans to build their businesses. It may be time to let Mitt run the lemonade stand.


Prev 1 2 Next All


Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight