“I am learning from conversations with my fellow NASDA members that they too are concerned about the ability to enforce rules that are unclear,” said Coba. “Growers in my state are concerned about the complexity of following multiple rules and feel some alternatives might be a better way to proactively regulate certain commodities. We want to work with FDA and other stakeholders to get the rules right.”
One of the many reasons FSMA was passed was to level the field between domestic and foreign producers. NASDA members expressed concern they are hearing from producers regarding their fears that enforcement of domestic growers will be greater than imported food producers.
North Carolina Commissioner of Agriculture Steve Troxler, NASDA President, hosted NASDA members in Asheville, North Carolina. As the chief regulator of North Carolina’s 52,000 farms, Troxler knows first-hand the importance of ensuring these proposed food safety rules provide a common sense framework for an integrated state-federal implementation of FSMA.
“We have appreciated FDA’s willingness to meet one-on-one to hear many state’s concerns,” said Troxler. “It is important that we continue these conversations so the FDA can hear concerns from real farmers across the country. Postponing these rules will allow needed time for FDA and the states to make progress on a state-federal partnership on food safety. This partnership must be in place before implementation begins.”Vermont Secretary of Agriculture Chuck Ross will make food safety a priority for the association during his tenure as the President of NASDA in the upcoming year.
“NASDA is fully committed to food safety and the successful implementation of FSMA,” said Ross. “We must take the time to get this right for the sake of our producers, processors and consumers. I look forward to working with our partners and consumer groups to engage Congress and FDA in developing an implementable food safety program.”
It is interesting to see that one of the major concerns expressed by NASDA members is equal treatment of domestic and imported producers. No doubt, representatives of importers and foreign producers have the same worry about the regulations, though viewed from the opposite perspective.