Today's Pricing

WATERMELON — F.O.B.S AS OF MAY 13

MEXICO CROSSINGS THROUGH NOGALES, ARIZ. — Crossings (705-766-766, seedless 683-751-759, seeded 22-15-7) — Movement expected about the same. Trading seeded slow, others moderate. Prices seedless 35-60 counts lower, others generally unchanged. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35-60 counts mostly 20 cents, 75-80s 14-16 cents; red-flesh seeded-type approximately 35-55 counts 12-14 cents. Flat cartons red-flesh seedless miniature 6-9s $7-9. Quality variable. Many present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments.

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY, TEXAS — Shipments (29-96-255, seedless 26-83-223, seeded 3-13-32) — Movement expected to decrease slightly. Trading very active at slightly lower prices. Prices 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seedless-type approximately 35-60 counts 28 cents, seeded-type approximately 28-35 counts mostly 21-22 cents. Quality generally good. Most present shipments from prior bookings and/or previous commitments at lower prices.

FLORIDA — Shipments (124-159-233, red-flesh seeded 16-29-53, red-flesh seedless 51-130-180) — Movement expected to increase as more growers start the season in central Florida. Harvesting slowed. Trading very active. Prices generally unchanged. 24-inch bins per-pound red-flesh seeded-type 35s 24-25 cents; red-flesh seedless-type 45 count 29-30 cents, 60 count 29-30 cents. Quality generally good.

IMPERIAL AND COACHELLA VALLEYS, CALIF., AND CENTRAL AND WESTERN ARIZONA — Shipments (AZ seedless 0-23-16, CA 0-26-78, seedless 0-24-73, seeded 0-2-5) — Movement from western Arizona, Imperial and Coachella valleys expected to increase seasonally. Trading fairly active at slightly lower prices. Prices slightly lower. Red-flesh seedless-type per pound 24-inch bins approximately 35 and 45 counts mostly 22 cents. Organic red-flesh seedless 24-inch bins per pound approximately 35 and 45 counts 35 cents; miniature carton 6s and 8s $20.50. Quality generally good. Harvest central Arizona expected to begin the week of May 27.



Learn More
  • Industry Alerts: USDA proceedings,
    Bankruptcy petitions — Learn more...
  • New Companies: PACA new
    licensees — Learn more...
  • Bankruptcy petitions have been filed by these companies — Learn more...
  • Company Listing changes: Address, personnel,
    contact information — Learn more...

Fresh Talk Blog

Promise of immigration reform can't be cruel trick again

National Editor Tom Karst The promise of immigration reform can be compared to when the "Peanuts" comic strip character Lucy holds the football for Charlie Brown to kick. Just as Charlie Brown believes that Lucy, for once, will hold the ball perfectly in place for him to kick it through the imaginary uprights, Lucy pulls the ball back. Charlie Brown lands on his backside and tragic hilarity ensues.

The cruelty of repeated tries at immigration reform without a favorable outcome is surely wearing on growers in the same way. But hope is there, still.

The point of it is whether immigration reform can deliver on two desired results: an improved guest worker program for agriculture and a way for the current undocumented workers to remain in the workforce.

The American economy and its farmers can’t withstand another round of foolish delay, another football pulled away at the last minute.

Lee Wicker, deputy director of the Vass-based North Carolina Growers Association, told me it is not the fear of enforcement that is compelling growers to become more vocal about immigration reform. Instead, it is the fear that the supply of farm workers is growing more and more inadequate.

With specialty crop commodities often requiring thousands of dollars per acre to grow the crop and get it to market, farmers can’t go to the bank for a $1 million operating loan and not know if he will have enough workers to harvest his crops.

“This notion of going and borrowing a million plus dollars for an operating loan and just hoping that you will have enough labor to get all the work done; farmers are gamblers by their very nature, but they don’t want play Russian roulette,” he said.

There is some talk now that even with immigration reform wapo.st/TgOTBJ, the demographics of Mexico are changing and that reality will leave the U.S. with worker shortages. The “end of farm labor abundance, as it were.

This may be true, that Mexico has decreasing ability to supply the U.S. with farm labor over time. Yet in any case there is no argument against bold action to create an employer-friendly guest worker program as soon as possible.

The fact that a bipartisan group of U.S. senators have agreed on principles for the framework of immigration reform is encouraging. The general aim of the legislation sounds, familiar, true: tough but fair path to citizenship, effective employment verification system, and an improved process to bring future workers to the U.S.

While the Senate plan stated reform legislation should create a workable program to meet the needs of America’s agricultural industry, President Obama didn’t specifically address agriculture.

In the months ahead, Congress and the president must make a generous provision for future flows of agriculture workers into the U.S.

If giving a path to citizenship to current undocumented workers is important to them, they must go against Big Labor to insist that an improved guest worker program is available to growers.

United Farm Workers president Arturo Rodriguez said in a statement that he was pleased that President Obama didn’t propose a new visa program for guest workers. While farm labor advocates can be valuable allies for immigration reform, President Obama and members of Congress must meet the labor needs of production agriculture. Unions have traditionally been against guest worker programs so their counsel on the subject is tainted.

Many farm labor advocates believe the U.S. Department of Agriculture should run the next version of the agricultural guest worker program, with the primary priority of helping U.S. agricultural employers find the guest workers they need in a timely fashion.

In the months ahead, the debate on immigration reform will have to navigate the explosive territory of “amnesty” in dealing with current unauthorized workers. Health care costs will also be raised as a volatile objection to moving forward.

Given the potential pitfalls ahead, failure is always a possibility. Whether it is union-friendly liberal Democrats or Tea Party conservatives who pull the football away, agricultural producers will be on their backsides either way. Again.

A better result would be the ball splitting the uprights, giving President Obama a lasting legacy and Republicans a stronger Latino appeal in the next election. And most importantly, of course, fruit and vegetable growers would have a more secure promise of labor to harvest U.S.-grown fresh produce.


Prev 1 2 Next All


Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Ted Schultze    
Report Abuse
Maple Grove, MN  |  February, 01, 2013 at 02:08 PM

Let's hope our gutless congress can do something correct instead of worrying about re election in every thing they do. I think the problem is that they are all running for election all of the time and that creates a conflict of interest. That is to say, they are supposed to make the hard decisions but are afraid to because some of their constituents might not like them and they might have to go home. The solution is, I think, a single term for them all.

They persist in doling out subsidies and that is an ongoing problem. After all, one mans subsidy is another mans taxes. They don't raise taxes to pay for the subsidy and look at our federal deficit.

Sorry for my soapbox rant.

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight