Many consumers don’t trust industry food safety efforts

Perception is reality and a new survey from food and marketing agency Charleston Orwig found that more than a quarter of consumers said they do not trust the vigilance of the food industry’s safety efforts.

D7688467-3944-48F4-86EB1B6E30B705BA.png
D7688467-3944-48F4-86EB1B6E30B705BA.png
(The Packer)

Perception is reality and a new survey from food and marketing agency Charleston Orwig found that more than a quarter of consumers said they do not trust the vigilance of the food industry’s safety efforts.

In a blog post called “Food Safety in America - Time to Bolster Consumer Confidence,” the agency reported a survey of 500 consumers found:

  • When asked if they trusted the food industry for safe food, 48% said they do trust the food industry and 27% said they did not;
  • More than 77% of consumers say that cooking a meal in their own kitchens is the best way to ensure it is safe to eat;
  • Restaurants were deemed the second safest, with more than 59% of consumers considering this to be a reliable option;
  • Just 29% of respondents consider food trucks or public vendors safe and almost 42% considering this option potentially unsafe;
  • Asked to compare food safety now versus a decade ago, about 35% of consumer said food is safer and 32% said it was less safe;
  • The survey said 59% of consumers said they assume food from individual farmers, food manufacturers or restaurants is safe if they have not heard about a specific problem;
  • The survey said that having had a food-borne illness did not make a person think food was less safe than participants overall;
  • 49% of consumers said grains, beans and pasta are the safest foods, followed by fresh fruits and vegetables at 42%;
  • Leafy greens and lettuce were tied with processed food as the next category of highest concern with 45% of consumers rating them risky, according to the survey; and
  • 55% say meat and poultry are the riskiest to eat; the blog post speculated the divide could be tied to people’s overall perception of what makes up a healthy diet.

TK: As the Charleston Orwig blog post concludes, the industry needs to do a better job of communicating their food safety efforts to consumers. An unanswered question in this discussion is how consumer doubts about food safety reduce consumption.

On a related note, check out Farm Journal’s effort to build “Trust in Food” at this link.

The Packer logo (567x120)
Related Stories
The company says it’s leveraging its more than 25 years of supply chain expertise to help grower-packer-shippers, retailers, foodservice operators and distributors simplify the supply chain, reduce food waste, optimize inventory levels, mitigate compliance risk and increase profitably.
Fresh from securing key advocacy wins, the International Fresh Produce Association CEO brought a clear message to the recent Washington Conference: The produce industry’s voice is actively shaping federal policy, but the fight for fresh is far from over.
At the recent Washington Conference, panelist Rochelle Bohm of CMI Orchards warned the “exorbitant” fees associated with EPR compliance will quickly swallow up what little financial breathing room produce companies have left.
Read Next
Rochelle Bohm of CMI Orchards discusses the threat that extended producer responsibility laws pose to the fresh produce industry and why the high cost of sustainable packaging will be passed on to consumers.
Get Daily News
GET MARKET ALERTS
Get News & Markets App