The International Fresh Produce Association and other groups have filed a lawsuit against the Department of Labor’s recently finalized H-2A rule.
The lawsuit alleges that the rule illegally gives temporary agriculture workers collective bargaining rights, restricts the First Amendment rights of farmers who employ H-2A workers, and creates additional onerous burdens for employers and state governments, according to a news release.
The other plaintiffs in the action are the American Farm Bureau Federation, AmericanHort, Florida Fruit & Vegetable Association, Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation, North American Blueberry Council, State of Mississippi, Stone County Farm Bureau, Texas International Produce Association, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
The release said the lawsuit argues that DOL’s rule is causing and will continue to cause irreparable harm to the carefully balanced and essential American agriculture industry.
“DOL is exacerbating an already enormously challenging labor crisis for growers and agriculture employers across the country,” IFPA CEO Cathy Burns said in the release. “This lawsuit challenges the unauthorized process through which DOL passed this rule and the unlawful and unconstitutional impacts it has on American agriculture employers. Our industry is dedicated to providing fresh, healthy foods that nourish the world, but without certainty in the H-2A program, which provides farmers access to qualified, valued foreign workers and, likewise, gives those workers the ability to legally work in the United States, it is much harder for us to grow and harvest the fresh fruit and vegetables consumers want and expect throughout the year. IFPA has challenged the DOL’s damaging regulation at every stage of the rulemaking process, and this lawsuit is the next step in our work to protect the fresh produce industry.”
“The rule, and DOL’s bifurcated implementation of it, further exacerbates America’s agriculture labor crisis that is threatening the ability of our farmers to compete and succeed in a global produce market,” Kasey Cronquist, president of the North American Blueberry Council (NABC), said in the release. “Despite increasing costs of labor caused by an artificially inflated wage rate and compounding regulations, blueberry growers are steadfast in their commitment to the people they employ. NABC is proud to represent blueberry growers across the country and stand alongside our allies in challenging this rule.”
The lawsuit, filed in the Southern District of Mississippi with representation from McDermott, Will & Emery, requests a permanent injunction of DOL’s Improving Protections for Workers in Temporary Agricultural Employment in the United States. In August, the court in Kansas v. U.S. Department of Labor — a similar case in the 11th Circuit brought by 17 state attorneys general, the Georgia Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association, and Miles Berry Farm — found the rule unconstitutional and enjoined DOL from enforcing it within the 17 states, the release said.
That ruling bolsters the plaintiffs’ position in this case and creates the current untenable situation in which employers in the agriculture industry must abide by different regulations and meet different requirements depending solely on the states in which they are located, according to the release.
The complaint can be found at ECF #1, docket number 24-cv-00309: https://www.freshproduce.com/siteassets/files/press-center/complaint-for-a-stay-and-vacatur-10-08-2024.pdf
