U.S. trading relationship with China still on thin ice

What is the future of the U.S. trading relationship with China?

75ED4BA3-A6C0-4781-9A9C499EB45DBB11.png
75ED4BA3-A6C0-4781-9A9C499EB45DBB11.png
(The Packer)

What is the future of the U.S. trading relationship with China?

That’s a big question for both the produce industry and the entire U.S. economy, and The Packer’s Tom Karst on May 4 talked with Richard Owen about that topic and other trade issues on May 4.

Owen, vice president of global membership and engagement at the Produce Marketing Association, said the U.S. and China don’t have a stable relationship despite the encouraging Phase 1 trade agreement inked between the two countries earlier this year.

President Trump has recently criticized China for failing to buy enough U.S. agricultural products, in addition to pointed criticism from Trump on China’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“I think part of this is the fact that this is an election year, and so politics are involved,” Owen said. China’s commitment as part of the Phase 1 agreement was to buy at least $19.5 billion more than its 2017 imports.

“China is going to be challenged with (buying their promised imports of U.S. products) this year because of the fact that their economy was almost shut down for six to eight weeks,” Owen said. “China is really going to be in a bind to make the commitments that it made to the US government for purchases.”

The hope for U.S. fresh produce exporters is that China’s demand recovers by later in the year. Owen said Trump’s trade goals appear to be centered on trying to have as much domestic consumption of U.S. farm goods within the U.S. as possible.

“I see that as being a core part of the economic policy emerging from the reentry of the economy from COVID-19,” he said. “As the country slowly starts to move into the next phase, I do see a commitment from the administration, whether it’s the food box distribution program, whether it’s direct payments, to providing some support for the agricultural industry as much as possible to increase domestic consumption of those products.”

“At the end of the day, it’s the U.S. consumer that makes the most difference for whether the industry will have some type of decent recovery from the truly dire economic circumstances that occurred as part of COVID-19 pandemic,” he said.

Owen also talked about industry reaction to, and next steps for, the USDA’s produce box and direct payment programs.

Related articles

The Packer’s COVID-19 Updates

The Packer’s Videos

The Packer logo (567x120)
Related Stories
The Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation has released its long-awaited final environmental impact statement. Farmers in the lower basin worry it could mean cuts to their water supply, while upper basin farmers are seeing higher hay prices and cattle sales.
Tapped by Secretary Rollins, Kip Tom is building a faster, satellite-driven replacement for NASS’s aging survey system, one he says could turn monthly reports into biweekly ones by year’s end for multiple crops.
The USDA plans to move more than 2,500 employees from Washington under reorganization while union surveys show few employees will relocate.
Read Next
Following systemic security breaches and compromised traceability in Mexico’s avocado export system, the California Avocado Commission is calling on USDA to conduct comprehensive audits and institute a seasonal tariff-rate quota to restore market integrity and protect domestic growers.
Get Daily News
GET MARKET ALERTS
Get News & Markets App